Urologia Internationalis
Review
Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer – The Case for Radical ProstatectomyHakenberg O.W. · Fröhner M. · Wirth M.P.Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum ‘Carl Gustav Carus’ der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: April 25, 2006
Accepted: April 25, 2006
Published online: October 11, 2006
Issue release date: October 2006
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 1
ISSN: 0042-1138 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0399 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/UIN
Abstract
The treatment of clinically locally advanced prostate carcinoma (stage cT3) remains controversial. One of the main reasons for this controversy results from the substantial staging error attached to the clinical diagnosis cT3 with overstaged T2 tumors and understaged node-positive cases. Treatment options in this situation include radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, immediate or delayed androgen deprivation treatment and the so-called ‘watchful waiting’. Acceptable and often surprisingly good tumor-specific survival rates have been reported for radical prostatectomy in pT3 series – based on good clinical case selection – approaching those of pT2 series. In lymph node-positive pT3 cases, adjuvant hormone deprivation seems to prolong survival which it does not in lymph node-negative pT3 disease. A benefit of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for pT3 cases in prolonging overall survival has not been shown, despite the fact that it can prevent or delay biochemical and local recurrence. External beam radiotherapy as the only treatment for cT3 disease results in unfavorable tumor-specific survival rates, which can be significantly improved with adjuvant hormonal treatment with LHRH agonists. If, in case of advanced age and/or significant comorbidity, primary hormonal treatment is chosen, early hormonal deprivation therapy seems to offer marginal benefits in survival compared to delayed treatment.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- Meltzer D, Egleston B, Abdalla I: Patterns of prostate cancer treatment by clinical stage and age. Am J Public Health 2001;91:126–128.
- Partin AW, Kattan MV, Subong ENP, Walsh PC, Wojno KJ, Oesterling JE, Scardino PT, Pearson JD: Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1997;277:1445–1451.
-
Aus G, Abbou CC, Heidenreich A, Schmid HP, van Poppel H, Wolff JM, ZF: Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Arnhem, European Association of Urology, 2003.
- Isorna Martinez de la Riva S, Belon Lopez-Tomasety J, Marrero Dominguez R, Alvarez Cruz E, Santamaria Blanco P: Radical prostatectomy as monotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer (T3a): 12 years’ follow-up. Arch Esp Urol 2004;57:679–692.
- Gerber GS, Thisted RA, Chodak GW, Schroder FH, Frohmuller HG, Scardino PT, Paulson DF, Middleton AW Jr, Rukstalis DB, Smith JA Jr, Ohori M, Theiss M, Schellhammer PF: Results of radical prostatectomy in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: multi-institutional pooled analysis. Eur Urol 1997;32:385–390.
- Ward JF, Slezak JM, Blute ML, Bergstrahl EJ, Zincke H: Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome. BJU Int 2005;95:751–756.
- Amling CL, Leibovich BC, Lerner SE, Bergstrahl EJ, Blute ML, Myers RP, Zincke H: Primary surgical therapy for clinical stage T3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Semin Urol Oncol 1997;15:215–221.
- Meraney AM, Haese A, Palisaar J, Graefen M, Steuber T, Huland H, Klein EA: Surgical management of prostate cancer: advances based on a rational approach to the data. Eur J Cancer 2005;41:888–907.
- Brassell SA, Rosner IL, McLeod DG: Update on magneteic resonance imaging, ProstaScint and novel imaging in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:163–166.
- Yoshida S, Nakagomi K, Goto S, Futatsubashi M, Torizuka T: 11C-choline positron emission tomography in prostate cancer: primary staging and recurrent site staging. Urol Int 2005;74:214–220.
- Wolff JM, Zimny M, Burchers H, Wildberger J, Buell U, Jakse G: Is prostate-specific antigen a reliable marker of bone metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed cancer of the prostate? Eur Urol 1998;33:376–381.
- Puppo P, Perachino M: Clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen and Gleason grade to predict extracapsular disease or nodal metastasis in men with newly diagnosed, previously untreated prostate cancer. A multicenter study. Eur Urol 1997;32:273–279.
- Sands ME, Zagars GK, Pollack A, von Eschenbach AC: Serum prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, pathological grade and the incidence of nodal metastases in prostate cancer. Urology 1994;44:215–220.
- Van Poppel H, Goethuys H, Callewaert P, Vanuytsel L, van de Voorde W, Baert L: Radical prostatectomy can provide cure for well selected clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2000;38:372–379.
- Barry MJ, Albertsen PC, Bagshaw MA, Blute ML, Cox R, Middleton RG: Gleason DF, Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, Jacobsen SJ: Outcomes for men with clinically nonmetastatic prostate carcinoma managed with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or expectant management: a retrospective analysis. Cancer 2001;91:2302–2314.
- Neulander EZ, Soloway MS: Failure after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2003;61:30–36.
- Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR, Epstein JI, Walsh PC: Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am 2001;28:555–565.
- Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, Walsh PC: Biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2003;169:517–523.
- Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, Slawin K, Scardino PT: Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2005;174:903–907.
- Zincke H, Fleming TR, Furlow WL, Myers RP, Utz D, Radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for high-stage cancer of the prostate. Cancer 1981;47:1901–1910.
- Lerner SE, Blute ML, Zincke H: Extended experience with radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. Outcome and contemporary morbidity. J Urol 1995;154:1447–1452.
- Van den Ouden D, Hop WC, Schroder FH: Progression in and survival of patients in locally advanced prostate cancer (T3) treated with radical prostatectomy as monotherapy. J Urol 1998;160:1392–1397.
- Cadeddu JA, Partin AW, Epstein JI, Walsh PC: Stage D1 (T1-3,N1-3,M0) prostate cancer: a case-controlled comparison of conservative treatment versus radical prostatectomy. Urology 1997;50:251–255.
- Frohmüller HGW, Theiss M, Manseck A, Wirth MP: Survival, quality of life of patients with stage D1 (T1-3,pN1-2,M0) prostate cancer. Radical prostatectomy plus androgen deprivation versus androgen deprivation alone. Eur Urol 1995;27:202–206.
- Schulman CC, Debruyne FMJ, Forster G, Selvaggi FP, Zlotta AR, Witjes WPJ, et al: Four-year follow-up results of a European prospective randomized study on neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in T2-3N0M0 prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2000;38:706–713.
- Steinberg GD, Epstein JI, Piantadosi S, Walsh PC, Management of stage D1 adenocarcinoma of the prostate: the Johns Hopkins experience 1974–1987. J Urol 1990;144:1425–1432.
- Frazier HA, Robertson JE, Paulson DF: Does radical prostatectomy in the presence of positive lymph nodes enhance survival? World J Urol 1994;12:308–312.
- DeKernion JB, Huang MY, Kaufmann JJ, Smith RB: Result of treatment of patients with stage D1 prostatic carcinoma. Urology 1985;26:446–451.
- Golimbu M, Provet J, Al-Akari S, Morales P: Radical prostatectomy for stage D1 prostate cancer. Prognostic variables and results of treatment. Urology 1987;30:427–435.
-
Messing EM, Manola J, Sarosdy M, Wilding G, Crawford ED, Trump D: Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node positive prostate cancer: results at 10 years of EST 3886. J Urol 2003;168(suppl):1480.
- Cheng L, Zincke H, Blute ML, Bergstrahl EJ, Scherer B, Bostwick DG: Risk of prostate carcinoma death in patients with lymph node metastasis. Cancer 2001;91:66–73.
- Bader P, Burckhard FC, Markwalder R, Studer U: Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? J Urol 2003;169:849–854.
- Wu JJ, King SC, Montana GS, McKinstry CA, Anscher MS: The efficacy of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy in patients with an isolated elevation of serum prostate-specific antigen. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995;32:317.
-
Bolla M: Treatment of localized or locally advanced prostate cancer: the clinical use of radiotherapy. EAU Update Series 2003;1:23–31.
External Resources
-
Wiegel T, Bottke D, Willich N, Piechota H, Souchon R, Stoeckle M, Ruebe C, Hinke A, Hinkelbein W, Miller K: Phase III result of adjuvant radiotherapy versus ‘wait and see’ in patients with pT3 prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy (ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95). Proc ASCO, 2005.
- Bolla M, van Poppel H, van Cangh P, Collette L, Vekemans K, Da Pozzo L, de Reijke TM, Verbays A, Bosset JF, van Velthoven R, Marechal JM, Scalliet P, Haustermans K, Pierart M: For the EORTC, postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet 2005;366:572–578.
- Davis BJ, Pisansky TM, Leibovich BC: Adjuvant external radiation therapy following RP for node-negative prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2003;13:117–119.
- Zincke H, Lau W, Bergstralh, Blute ML: Role of early adjuvant hormonal therapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2001;166:2208–2215.
- Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, Larson-Keller JJ, Farrow GM, Myers RP, Lieber MM, Barrett DM, Rife CC, Gonchoroff NJ: Stage D1 prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy and adjuvant hormonal treatment. Cancer 1992;70:311–323.
- Seay TM, Blute ML, Zincke H: Long-term outcome in patients with pTxN+ adenocarcinoma of prostate treated with radical prostatectomy and early androgen ablation. J Urol 1998;159:357–364.
- Messing EM, Manola J, Sarosdy M, et al: Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1781–1788.
- Walsh PC, deWeese TL, Eisenberger MA: A structured debate: immediate versus deferred androgen suppression in prostate cancer – evidence for deferred treatment. J Urol 2001;166:508–515.
- Schröder FH, Kurth KH, Fossa SD, Hoekstra WJ, Karthaus HM, Dubois M, Corlette L, Members of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group: Early versus delayed endocrine treatment of pN1-3M0 prostate cancer without local treatment of the primary tumor: results of European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer 30846 – a phase III study. J Urol 2004;172:923–927.
- Wirth MP, Weissbach L, Marx FJ, Heckl W, Jellinghaus W, Riedmiller H, Noack B, Hinke A, Froehner M: Prospective randomized trial comparing flutamide as adjuvant treatment versus observation after radical prostatectomy for locally advanced, lymph node-negative prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2004;45:267–270.
- Soloway MS, Pareek K, Sharifi R, Wajsman Z, McLeod D, Wood DP Jr, Puras-Baez A, The Lupron Depot Neoadjuvant Prostate Cancer Study Group: Neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy in cT2bNxMo prostate cancer: 5-year results. J Urol 2002;167:112–116.
- Aus G, Abrahamsson PA, Ahlgren G, Hugosson J, Lundberg S, Schain M, Schelin S, Pedersen K: Three-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: a 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2002;90:561–566.
- Klotz LH, Goldenberg SL, Jewett MAS, Fradet Y, Nam R, Barkin J, Chin J, Chatterjee S, Canadian Uro-Oncology Group: Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of 0 versus 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003;170:791–794.
- Oh WK, Manola J, Bittmann L, Brufsky A, Kaplan ID, Smith MR, Kaufman DS, Kantoff PW: Finasteride and flutamide therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer: response to subsequent castration and long-term follow-up. Urology 2003;62:99–104.
- Khan MA, Partin AW: Management of high-risk populations with locally advanced prostate cancer. Oncologist 2003;8:259–269.
- Miyake H, Sakai I, Harada KI, Takechi Y, Hara I, Eto H: Prognostic significance of the tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Urol Int 2005;74:27–31.
-
Lee F, Siders DB, McHugh TA, Solomon MH, Mayman DM: Neoadjuvant androgen ablation therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: results of a 3-year follow-up. Endocr Relat Cancer 1996;3:171–177.
External Resources
- Prezioso D, Lotti T, Polito M, Montironi R, Neoadjuvant Study Group: Neoadjuvant hormone treatment with leuprolide acetate depot 3.75 mg and cyproterone acetate before radical prostatectomy: a randomized study. Urol Int 2004;72:189–195.
- Homma Y, Akaza H, Okada K, Yokoyama M, Moriyama N, Usami M, Hirao Y, Tsushima T, Sakamoto A, Ohashi Y, Aso Y, The Prostate Cancer Study Group: Early results of radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer with or without preoperative androgen deprivation. Int J Urol 1999;6:229–237.
- Febbo PG, Richie JP, George DJ, Loda M, Manola J, Shankar S, Barnes AS, Tempany C, Catalona W, Kantoff PW, Oh WK: Neoadjuvant docetaxel before radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:5233–5240.
- Berger AP, Niescher M, Fischer-Colbrie R, Pelzer A, Bartsch G, Horninger W: Single-agent chemotherapy with docetaxel significantly reduces PSA levels in patients with high grade localized prostate cancers. Urol Int 2004;73:110–112.
-
Prayer-Galetti T, Zattoni F, Capizzi A, Dal Moro F, Pagano F: Disease-free survival in patients with pathological ‘C stage’ prostate cancer at radical retropubic prostatectomy submitted to adjuvant hormonal treatment. Eur Urol 2000;38(suppl 4):504.
- Wirth MP, Tyrell C, Wallace M, Delaere KP, Sanchez-Chapado M, Ramon J, Hetherington J, Pina F, Heynes CF, Borchers TM, Morris T, Stone A: Bicalutamide (Casodex) 150 mg as immediate therapy in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer significantly reduces the risk of disease progression. Urology 2001;58:146–150.
- Wirth MP, See WA, McLeod DG, Iversen P, Morris T, Carroll K, Casodex Early Prostate Cancer Trialists’ Group: Bicalutamide (Casodex) 150 mg in addition to watchful waiting in patients with early non-metastatic prostate cancer: updated analysis at a median 5.4 years’ follow-up. J Urol 2004;172:1865–1870.
- McLeod DG, Iversen P, See WA, Morris T, Armstrong J, Wirth MP, Casodex Early Prostate Cancer Trialists’ Group: Bicalutamide 150 mg plus standard care vs. standard care alone for early prostate cancer. BJU Int 2006;97:247–254.
Article / Publication Details
Received: April 25, 2006
Accepted: April 25, 2006
Published online: October 11, 2006
Issue release date: October 2006
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 1
ISSN: 0042-1138 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0399 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/UIN
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission