Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Paper

Allergenicity Assessment of Apple Cultivars: Hurdles in Quantifying Labile Fruit Allergens

Zuidmeer L.a · van Leeuwen W.A.a · Kleine Budde I.a · Breiteneder H.b · Ma Y.b · Mills C.c · Sancho A.I.c · Meulenbroek E.J.d · van de Weg E.d · Gilissen L.d · Ferreira F.e · Hoffmann-Sommergruber K.b · van Ree R.a

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; bDepartment of Pathophysiology, Center of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; cInstitute of Food Research, Norwich, UK; dPlant Research International, Wageningen, The Netherlands; eDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Related Articles for ""

Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2006;141:230–240

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information












By signing up for MyKarger you will automatically participate in our year-End raffle.
If you Then Do Not wish To participate, please uncheck the following box.

Yes, I wish To participate In the year-End raffle And Get the chance To win some Of our most interesting books, And other attractive prizes.


I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information












By signing up for MyKarger you will automatically participate in our year-End raffle.
If you Then Do Not wish To participate, please uncheck the following box.

Yes, I wish To participate In the year-End raffle And Get the chance To win some Of our most interesting books, And other attractive prizes.


I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: November 15, 2005
Accepted: May 16, 2006
Published online: October 19, 2006
Issue release date: October 2006

Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 8
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 1018-2438 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0097 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/IAA

Abstract

Background: Assessment of allergenicity of foods is important for allergic consumers and regulators. Immunoassays to measure major food allergens are widely applied, often giving variable results. Using the major apple allergen Mal d 1 as a model, we aimed to establish at the molecular level why different immunoassays for assessing allergenicity of apple cultivars produce conflicting outcomes. Methods: Mal d 1 was measured in 53 cultivars from Italy and 35 from The Netherlands, using four different immunoassays. Purified Mal d 1 standards were molecularly characterized by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) and mass spectrometry (MS). Results: Three immunoassays using an identical standard gave similar results. Minor differences in sample preparation already resulted in significant loss of allergenicity. The fourth assay, using a different Mal d 1 standard, gave 10- to 100-fold lower outcomes. By SEC, this standard was shown to be almost fully aggregated. This aggregation was accompanied by a decrease of the mass of the Mal d 1 molecule by ∼1 kDa as analyzed by MS. The deviating immunoassay was shown to selectively recognize this aggregated form of Mal d 1, whereas the other three assays, including the one based on IgE antibody recognition, preferentially bound non-aggregated allergen. Conclusions: Variable and poorly controllable major allergen modification in both extracts and standards hamper accurate allergenicity assessments of fruits.

© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Ebner C, Hirschwehr R, Bauer L, Breiteneder H, Valenta R, Ebner H, Kraft D, Scheiner O: Identification of allergens in fruits and vegetables: IgE cross-reactivities with the important birch pollen allergens Bet v 1 and Bet v 2 (birch profilin). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;95:962–969.
  2. Calkhoven PG, Aalbers M, Koshte VL, Pos O, Oei HD, Aalberse RC: Cross-reactivity among birch pollen, vegetables and fruits as detected by IgE antibodies is due to at least three distinct cross-reactive structures. Allergy 1987;42:382–390.
  3. Breiteneder H, Hassfeld W, Pettenburger K, Jarolim E, Breitenbach M, Rumpold H, Kraft D, Scheiner O: Isolation and characterization of messenger RNA from male inflorescences and pollen of the white birch (Betula verrucosa). Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1988;87:19–24.
  4. Lahti A, Björksten F, Hannuksela M: Allergy to birch pollen and apple, and cross-reactivity of the allergens studied with the RAST. Allergy 1980;35:297–300.
  5. Valenta R, Duchene M, Ebner C, Valent P, Sillaber C, Deviller P, Ferreira F, Tejkl M, Edelmann H, Kraft D, et al: Profilins constitute a novel family of functional plant pan-allergens. J Exp Med 1992;175:377–385.
  6. Karamloo F, Wangorsch A, Kasahara H, Davin LB, Haustein D, Lewis NG, Vieths S: Phenylcoumaran benzylic ether and isoflavonoid reductases are a new class of cross-reactive allergens in birch pollen, fruits and vegetables. Eur J Biochem 2001;268:5310–5320.
  7. Fernandez-Rivas M, van Ree R, Cuevas M: Allergy to Rosaceae fruits without related pollinosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:728–733.
  8. Pastorello EA, Pravettoni V, Farioli L, Ispano M, Fortunato D, Monza M, Giuffrida MG, Rivolta F, Scibola E, Ansaloni R, Incorvaia C, Conti A, Ortolani C: Clinical role of a lipid transfer protein that acts as a new apple-specific allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;104:1099–1106.
  9. Sanchez-Monge R, Lombardero M, Garcia-Selles FJ, Barber D, Salcedo G: Lipid-transfer proteins are relevant allergens in fruit allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:514–519.
  10. Hsieh LS, Moos M Jr, Lin Y: Characterization of apple 18 and 31 kD allergens by microsequencing and evaluation of their content during storage and ripening. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;96:960–970.
  11. Krebitz M, Wagner B, Ferreira F, Peterbauer C, Campillo N, Witty M, Kolarich D, Steinkellner H, Scheiner O, Breiteneder H: Plant-based heterologous expression of Mal d 2, a thaumatin-like protein and allergen of apple (Malus domestica), and its characterization as an antifungal protein. J Mol Biol 2003;329:721–730.
  12. Ortolani C, Ispano M, Pastorello E, Bigi A, Ansaloni R: The oral allergy syndrome. Ann Allergy 1988;61:47–52.
  13. Van Ree R: The oral allergy syndrome; in Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds): Contact Urticaria Syndrome. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1997, pp 289–299.
  14. Hoffmann-Sommergruber K: The SAFE Project: Plant Food Allergies: Field to Table Strategies for Reducing Their Incidence in Europe. Allergy 2005;60:436–442.
  15. Pastorello EA, Vieths S, Pravettoni V, Farioli L, Trambaioli C, Fortunato D, Luttkopf D, Calamari M, Ansaloni R, Scibilia J, Ballmer-Weber BK, Poulsen LK, Wutrich B, Hansen KS, Robino AM, Ortolani C, Conti A: Identification of hazelnut major allergens in sensitive patients with positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge results. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:563–570.
  16. Vieths S, Jankiewicz A, Schoning B, Aulepp H: Apple allergy: the IgE-binding potency of apple strains is related to the occurrence of the 18-kDa allergen. Allergy 1994;49:262–271.
  17. Son DY, Scheurer S, Hoffmann A, Haustein D, Vieths S: Pollen-related food allergy: cloning and immunological analysis of isoforms and mutants of Mal d 1, the major apple allergen, and Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen. Eur J Nutr 1999;38:201–215.
  18. Bolhaar ST, Van de Weg WE, van RR, Gonzalez-Mancebo E, Zuidmeer L, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CA, Fernandez-Rivas M, Jansen J, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Knulst AC, Gilissen LJ: In vivo assessment with prick-to-prick testing and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge of allergenicity of apple cultivars. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:1080–1086.
  19. Van Loon LCYAMG: Protease activity and pathogenesis-related proteins in virus-infected Samsun NN tobacco leaves. Plant Sci 2006;63:141.
  20. Linthorst HJM: Pathogenesis-related proteins of plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2006;10:123.
    External Resources
  21. Ernst D, Schraudner M, Langebartels C, Sandermann H Jr: Ozone-induced changes of mRNA levels of β1,3-glucanase, chitinase and ‘pathogenesis-related’ protein 1b in tobacco plants. Plant Mol Biol 1992;20:673–682.
  22. Marzban G, Puehringer H, Dey R, Brynda S, Ma Y, Martinelli A, Zaccarini M, van der Weg E, Housley Z, Kolarich D: Localisation and distribution of the major allergens in apple fruits. Plant Sci 2005;169:387–394.
  23. Björksten F, Halmepuro L, Hannuksela M, Lahti A: Extraction and properties of apple allergens. Allergy 1980;35:671–677.
  24. Akkerdaas JH, van Ree R, Aalbers M, Stapel SO, Aalberse RC: Multiplicity of cross-reactive epitopes on Bet v 1 as detected with monoclonal antibodies and human IgE. Allergy 1995;50:215–220.
  25. Lind SE, Janmey PA, Chaponnier C, Herbert TJ, Stossel TP: Reversible binding of actin to gelsolin and profilin in human platelet extracts. J Cell Biol 1987;105:833–842.
  26. Ma Y, Zuidmeer L, Bohle B, Bolhaar STH, Gadermaier G, Gonzalez-Mancebo E, Fernandez-Rivas M, Knulst AC, Himly M, Asero R, Ebner C, van Ree R, Ferreira F, Breiteneder H, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K: Characterization of recombinant Mal d 4 and its application for component-resolved diagnosis of apple allergy. 2006, in press.
  27. Steinbuch M, Audran R: The isolation of IgG from mammalian sera with the aid of caprylic acid. Arch Biochem Biophys 1969;134:279–284.
  28. Van Ree R, van Leeuwen WA, van den BM, Weller HH, Aalberse RC: IgE and IgG cross-reactivity among Lol p I and Lol p II/III. Identification of the C-termini of Lol p I, II, and III as cross-reactive structures. Allergy 1994;49:254–261.
  29. Zuidmeer L, van Leeuwen WA, Kleine BI, Cornelissen J, Bulder I, Rafalska I, Tellez BN, Akkerdaas JH, Asero R, Fernandez RM, Gonzalez ME, van Ree R: Lipid transfer proteins from fruit: cloning, expression and quantification. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2005;137:273–281.
  30. Van Ree R, Voitenko V, van Leeuwen WA, Aalberse RC: Profilin is a cross-reactive allergen in pollen and vegetable foods. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1992;98:97–104.
  31. Aalberse RC, Koshte V, Clemens JG: Immunoglobulin E antibodies that cross-react with vegetable foods, pollen, and Hymenoptera venom. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1981;68:356–364.
  32. Van Ree R, Clemens JG, Aalbers M, Stapel SO, Aalberse RC: Characterization with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies of a new major allergen from grass pollen in the group I molecular weight range. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:144–151.
  33. Moreno FJ, Jenkins JA, Mellon FA, Rigby NM, Robertson JA, Wellner N, Clare Mills EN: Mass spectrometry and structural characterization of 2S albumin isoforms from Brazil nuts (Bertholletia excelsa). Biochim Biophys Acta 2004;1698:175–186.
  34. Ortolani C, Ispano M, Pastorello EA, Ansaloni R, Magri GC: Comparison of results of skin prick tests (with fresh foods and commercial food extracts) and RAST in 100 patients with oral allergy syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:683–690.
  35. Rudeschko O, Fahlbusch B, Henzgen M, Schlenvoigt G, Herrmann D, Jager L: Optimization of apple allergen preparation for in vivo and in vitro diagnostics. Allergy 1995;50:262–268.
  36. Loomis WD: Overcoming problems of phenolics and quinones in the isolation of plant enzymes and organelles. Methods Enzymol 1974;31:528–544.
  37. Rudeschko O, Fahlbusch B, Henzgen M, Schlenvoigt G, Herrmann D, Vieths S, Jager L: Investigation of the stability of apple allergen extracts. Allergy 1995;50:575–580.
  38. Deluze C, Dunoyer-Geindre S, Girard JP: Comparative analysis of lyophilized fresh fruits and vegetables with commercial extracts for skin testing of patients with food allergy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 1991;1:53–57.
  39. Dreborg S, Foucard T: Allergy to apple, carrot and potato in children with birch pollen allergy. Allergy 1983;38:167–172.
  40. Vieths S, Hoffmann A, Holzhauser T, Muller U, Reindl J, Haustein D: Factors influencing the quality of food extracts for in vitro and in vivo diagnosis. Allergy 1998;53:65–71.
  41. Jensen-Jarolim E, Wiedermann U, Ganglberger E, Zurcher A, Stadler BM, Boltz-Nitulescu G, Scheiner O, Breiteneder H: Allergen mimotopes in food enhance type I allergic reactions in mice. FASEB J 1999;13:1586–1592.
  42. Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, de Vries SC, Gautier MF, Ciurana CL, Verbeek E, Mohammadi T, Knul-Brettlova V, Akkerdaas JH, Bulder I, Aalberse RC, van Ree R: Lipid transfer protein: a pan-allergen in plant-derived foods that is highly resistant to pepsin digestion. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000;122:20–32.
  43. Scheurer S, Lauer I, Foetisch K, Moncin MS, Retzek M, Hartz C, Enrique E, Lidholm J, Cistero-Bahima A, Vieths S: Strong allergenicity of Pru av 3, the lipid transfer protein from cherry, is related to high stability against thermal processing and digestion. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;114:900–907.
  44. Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Amato S, Falagiani P: Analysis of the heat stability of lipid transfer protein from apple. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;112:1009–1011.
  45. Sancho AI, Rigby NM, Zuidmeer L, Asero R, Mistrello G, Amato S, Gonzalez-Mancebo E, Fernandez-Rivas M, van RR, Mills EN: The effect of thermal processing on the IgE reactivity of the non-specific lipid transfer protein from apple, Mal d 3. Allergy 2005;60:1262–1268.
  46. Markovic-Housley Z, Degano M, Lamba D, Roepenack-Lahaye E, Clemens S, Susani M, Ferreira F, Scheiner O, Breiteneder H: Crystal structure of a hypoallergenic isoform of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 and its likely biological function as a plant steroid carrier. J Mol Biol 2003;325:123–133.
  47. Vieths S, Schoening B, Jankiewicz A: Occurrence of IgE binding allergens during ripening of apple fruits. Food Agric Immunol 2006;5:93–105.
  48. Laffer S, Vangelista L, Steinberger P, Kraft D, Pastore A, Valenta R: Molecular characterization of Bip 1, a monoclonal antibody that modulates IgE binding to birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1. J Immunol 1996;157:4953–4962.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: November 15, 2005
Accepted: May 16, 2006
Published online: October 19, 2006
Issue release date: October 2006

Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 8
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 1018-2438 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0097 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/IAA


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.