Tensile Strength and Host Response towards Silk and Type I Polypropylene Implants Used for Augmentation of Fascial Repair in a Rat ModelSpelzini F.a, d · Konstantinovic M.L.a · Guelinckx I.a · Verbist G.d · Verbeken E.b · De Ridder D.c · Deprest J.a, d
aCentre for Surgical Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, bDepartment of Pathology, and Pelvic Floor Centre of the Departments of cUrologyand dObstetrics & Gynaecology , University Hospital ‘Gasthuisberg’, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Objective: We compared host response, architectural integration and tensile strength of two different macroporous silk constructs to a polypropylene type I implant in a rat model for augmentation of primary fascial defect repair. Materials and Methods: Animals were sacrificed on days 7, 14, 30 and 90 after implantation. The explants were evaluated macroscopically for infections, herniations and adhesions, mechanically for tensile strength, and histopathologically, to evaluate collagen deposition and inflammatory response. Results: The tensile strength of the explants showed a gradual increase for all materials. All implants uniformly shrank around one fifth by 90 days. In the silk implants, the inflammatory reaction showed a remarkable higher number of foreign body giant cells that characteristically spread from the periphery into implants. Collagen deposition was comparable for all the materials. In Silk a higher grade of neovascularisation was observed. Conclusion: Silk explants expressed high tensiometric strength, which was associated with a marked fibrotic process. The silk implants induced a strong foreign body reaction accompanied by microscopic signs of architectural degradation at 90 days. Polypropylene explants showed a more moderate foreign body reaction without architectural disturbance.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.