Appetite and Energy Balance
Effect of Leptin Administration on Ovulation in Food-Restricted Rhesus MonkeysLujan M.E.a · Krzemien A.A.b · Reid R.L.b · Van Vugt D.A.a, b
Departments of aPhysiology and bObstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
A chronic negative energy balance due to low nutritional intake or increased energy expenditure alters several neuroendocrine axes. The reproductive and thyroid axes are inhibited while the adrenal axis is stimulated. In primates, anovulation resulting from a chronic negative energy balance is a condition often referred to as nutritional amenorrhea. The objective of the current study was to determine if hypoleptinemia induced by dietary restriction is responsible for these neuroendocrine changes, particularly anovulation. Five rhesus monkeys had their dietary intake gradually reduced to inhibit ovulation. Dietary restriction inhibited follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and triiodothyronine (T3) secretion and stimulated cortisol release. Recombinant human leptin (rhleptin) administered by continuous infusion into the lateral ventricle for 16 weeks inhibited cortisol secretion but failed to stimulate FSH, T3 or ovulation. An immune response to rhleptin was noted after 3 weeks of leptin administration. Realimentation resulted in weight gain and reversed all endocrine responses to dietary restriction, including ovulation. These results do not support a role for reduced leptin secretion in anovulation induced by dietary restriction. The inability of rhleptin to reverse anovulation induced by a negative energy balance in monkeys is in contrast to its stimulatory effect on ovulation in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea. Different outcomes may be attributed to the degree of negative energy balance, the immune response generated by interspecies leptin administration, and/or other experimental variables such as dose or route of administration. Attributing opposing outcomes to species differences is unwarranted until these variables can be further examined.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.