Compositional Bias and Size of Genomes of Human DNA VirusesSewatanon J. · Srichatrapimuk S. · Auewarakul P.
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Genomes of 144 human DNA viruses were analyzed in the aspect of their compositional asymmetry. DNA viruses were divided into two groups according to their genome sizes. The analysis revealed that the level of guanine and cytosine (GC content) in the coding sequences of small genome DNA viruses was significantly lower than that of large genome DNA viruses. Because small genome viruses replicate their genomes using cellular enzymes, while large genome viruses use their own enzymes for genome replication, the two groups of viruses may be under different mutational bias and/or selection pressure. In these viruses, GC content at the third codon position correlated with GC content at the first and second codon position. However, the relationship in small genome DNA viruses was weaker than that in large genome DNA viruses, suggesting that their genome composition may be more strongly influenced by codon usage preference or restriction on amino acid composition.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
- Sueoka N: Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:2653–2657.
- Sharp PM, Cowe E, Higgins DG, Shields DC, Wolfe KH, Wright F: Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;16:8207–8211.
- Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Jacobzone M, Mercier R: Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res 1981;9:r43–r74.
- Gouy M, Gautier C: Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res 1982;10:7055–7074.
- Sharp PM, Tuohy TM, Mosurski KR: Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res 1986;14:5125–5143.
- Powell JR, Moriyama EN: Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:7784–7790.
- Akashi H, Eyre-Walker A: Translational selection and molecular evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1998;8:688–693.
- Wolfe KH, Sharp PM, Li WH: Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature 1989;337:283–285.
- Sharp PM, Stenico M, Peden JF, Lloyd AT: Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both? Biochem Soc Trans 1993;21:835–841.
- Francino MP, Ochman H: Isochores result from mutation not selection. Nature 1999;400:30–31.
- Adams MJ, Antoniw JF: Codon usage bias amongst plant viruses. Arch Virol 2004;149:113–135.
- Jenkins GM, Holmes EC: The extent of codon usage bias in human RNA viruses and its evolutionary origin. Virus Res 2003;92:1–7.
- Auewarakul P: Composition bias and genome polarity of RNA viruses. Virus Res 2005;109:33–37.
- Grigoriev A: Strand-specific compositional asymmetries in double-stranded DNA viruses. Virus Res 1999;60:1–19.
- Zhao KN, Liu WJ, Frazer IH: Codon usage bias and A+T content variation in human papillomavirus genomes. Virus Res 2003;98:95–104.
Muzyczka N, Berns KI: Parvoviridae: The Viruses and Their Replication; in Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds): Fields’ Virology, ed 4. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 2327–2359.
Howley PM, Lowy DR: Papillomaviruses and their replication; in Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds): Fields’ Virology, ed 4. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 2197–2229.
Cole CN, Conzen SD: Polyomaviridae: the viruses and their replication; in Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds): Fields’ Virology, ed 4. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 2141–2174.
Moss B: Poxviridae: The viruses and their replication; in Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds): Fields’ Virology, ed 4. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 2849–2883.
Roizman B, Pellett PE: The family Herpesviridae: a brief introduction; in Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds): Fields’ Virology, ed 4. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 2391.
Shenk TE: Adenoviridae: the viruses and their replication; in Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds): Fields’ Virology, ed 4. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 2265–2300.
- Nakamura Y, Gojobori T, Ikemura T: Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucl Acids Res 2000;28:292.
Ganem D, Schneider R: Hepadnaviridae: the viruses and their replication; in Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds): Fields’ Virology, ed 4. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 2923–2969.
- Haas J, Park EC, Seed B: Codon usage limitation in the expression of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. Curr Biol 1996;6:315–324.
- Sharp PM, Li WH: The codon adaptation index – a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 1987;15:1281–1295.
Flint SJ, Enquist LW, Krug RM, Racaniello VR, Skalka AM: Principles of Virology: Molecular Biology, Pathogenesis, and Control. Washington, ASM Press, 2000, p 804.
- Sueoka N, Kawanishi Y: DNA G+C content of the third codon position and codon usage biases of human genes. Gene 2000;261:53–62.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.