Cerebrovascular Diseases
Original Paper
Acute Stroke Management in the ElderlyZeevi N.a · Chhabra J.b · Silverman I.E.c · Lee N.S.c · McCullough L.D.caDepartment of Neurology, bResearch Program and cStroke Center, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Conn., USA
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: June 13, 2006
Accepted: October 31, 2006
Published online: December 29, 2006
Issue release date: March 2007
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 6
ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CED
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Though the proportion of elderly stroke patients is increasing, patients >80 years are often excluded from clinical stroke trials. We reviewed the management of older patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and assessed the safety and efficacy of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) administration in a community-based setting. Methods: A retrospective review of patients >80 years (n = 341) admitted to a community stroke center with AIS were compared to their younger counterparts (n = 690) using the stroke center database from April 2003 to December 2005. Parameters that were measured included admission and discharge NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), rate of thrombolytic treatment, the frequency and etiology of thrombolytic exclusion criteria and complications from rtPA for the different aged populations. Additional data were collected for Barthel Index at 12 months. Results: A total of 166 patients underwent thrombolysis. Older patients were not delayed in reaching the hospital within 3 h of stroke onset (182/690, 26%, in the <80 cohort vs. 98/341, 29%, in the ≧80 cohort). Although the overall rates of tPA use were similar in both the young and aged cohort, older patients were less likely to be treated with rtPA because of reasons not listed as exclusion criteria (17% in the <80 cohort vs. 32% in the ≧80 cohort).The older group did not have an excess risk of intracranial hemorrhage following rtPA infusion despite equivalent NIHSS on admission (13.5 in the <80 cohort vs. 12.4 in the ≧80 cohort). Both groups showed improvement in NIHSS following thrombolytic treatment with a drop of 7.7 points in the younger age group and 5.6 points in the older group. Elderly patients treated with rtPA had a comparable 12-month modified Barthel Index score to younger cohorts. Conclusions: Early treatment with rtPA in patients >80 years appears to be both safe and efficacious. Treated patients showed improvements both acutely (a decrease in NIHSS at 72 h) and chronically, as shown by a sustained improvement in the Barthel Index. A large number of elderly patients were excluded from rtPA treatment despite arriving within the time frame of treatment for reasons not considered as traditional exclusion criteria. Older patients with AIS can be treated safely with thrombolytic therapy in a community setting. This therapy should not be withheld on the basis of age.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- Tanne D, Gorman MJ, Bates VE, Kasner SE, Scott P, Verro P, Binder JR, Dayno JM, Schultz LR, Levine SR: Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke in patients aged 80 years and older: the tPA stroke survey experience. Stroke 2000;31:370–375.
- Olindo S, Cabre P, Deschamps R, Chatot-Henry C, Rene-Corail P, Fournerie P, Saint-VIl M, May F, Smadja D: Acute stroke in the very elderly. Stroke 2003;34:1593–1597.
- Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Pracucci G, Basile AM, Trefoloni G, Vanni P, Wolfe CDA, Tilling K, Ebrahim S, Inzitari D: Stroke in very old. Stroke 1999;30:2313–2319.
- Simon JE, Sandler DL, Pexman JHW, Hill MD, Buchan AM: Is intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) safe for use in patients over 80 years old with acute ischaemic stroke? – the Calgary experience. Age Ageing 2004;33:143–149.
- Engelter ST, Reichhart M, Sekoranja L, Georgiadis D, Baumann A, Weder B, Müller F, Luthy R, Arnold M, Michel P, Mattle HP, Tettenborn B, Hungerbühler HJ, Baumgartner RW, Sztajzel R, Bogousslavsky J, Lyrer PA: Thrombolysis in stroke patients aged 80 years and older: Swiss survey of IV thrombolysis. Neurology 2005;65:1795–1798.
- Chen CI, Iguchi Y, Grotta JC, Garami Z, Uchino K, Shaltoni H, Alexandrov AV: Intravenous TPA for very old stroke patients. Eur Neurol 2005;54:140–144.
- Derex L, Nighoghossian N, Hermier M, Adeleine P, Philippeau F, Honnorat J, Yilmaz H, Dardel P, Froment JC, Trouillas P: Thrombolysis for ischemic stroke in patients with old microbleeds on pretreatment MRI. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:238–241.
- Helgason CM: Cardioembolic stroke: topography and pathogenesis. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 1992;4:28–58.
Article / Publication Details
Received: June 13, 2006
Accepted: October 31, 2006
Published online: December 29, 2006
Issue release date: March 2007
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 6
ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CED
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission