Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease Patients Intolerant to LevodopaLyons K.E. · Davis J.T. · Pahwa R.
University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Kansas City, Kans., USA
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Levodopa responsiveness has been shown to be the best predictor of improvement after subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson’s disease (PD). The objective of this study was to assess the effect of STN DBS on PD patients intolerant to levodopa due to severe acute side effects such as intolerable nausea. There were 10 patients in the study who received STN DBS for PD. Five patients who were intolerant to levodopa were matched based on age, disease duration, sex and presurgical disease severity to 5 patients taking levodopa and demonstrating a good levodopa response. Both groups had a significant improvement in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale activities of daily living and motor subscales as well as tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia scores at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery compared to baseline, and these improvements were equivalent between the two groups. Patient global ratings also indicated significant improvements at all follow-up visits. There were no differences in stimulator settings between the two groups at the 3-, 6- or 12-month follow-up visits. In conclusion, although levodopa responsiveness is the best predictor for outcome after STN DBS, carefully selected PD patients intolerant to levodopa can have significant improvement.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.