Background/Aims: A major goal of intracranial surgery is to maximize resection while minimizing neurological morbidity, particularly motor dysfunction. Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) is a common intraoperative adjunct used to identify functional motor cortex. In this study, we report on the safety/efficacy of short pulse train DCS (direct cortical stimulation motor-evoked potential, dcMEP) for motor mapping and monitoring during intracranial surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 29 patients undergoing elective craniotomy for lesions near the motor cortex was performed. dcMEP mapping (40-120 V, 500-1,000 Hz, 5-9 pulses/s, 1- to 3-ms interstimulus interval, monopolar, 50-μs pulse width) was performed either alone (n = 29) or in addition to standard DCS (n = 6). Outcome measures were positive MEPs and the presence of seizures during stimulation. dcMEP-based continuous corticospinal tract (CST) monitoring was also performed. Changes in stimulation threshold and new postoperative neurological deficits were recorded. Results: dcMEP mapping success was 96% and was not affected by preoperative motor status. Intraoperative seizure rates for dcMEP were 3% and were not related to preoperative seizure status. CST monitoring success rate was 96%, and changes in stimulation threshold were predictive of new permanent motor deficits. Conclusions: dcMEP is an effective method for mapping motor function and may prove useful for continuous CST monitoring.

Keywords:
Primary motor cortex, Motor function, Short pulse train technique, Direct cortical stimulation motor-evoked potential, Corticospinal tract
1.
Duffau H, Capelle L, Sichez J, Faillot T, Abdennour L, Law Koune JD, Dadoun S, Bitar A, Arthuis F, Van Effenterre R, Fohanno D: Intra-operative direct electrical stimulations of the central nervous system: the Salpêtrière experience with 60 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:1157-1167.
2.
Spena G, Nava A, Cassini F, Pepoli A, Bruno M, D'Agata F, Cauda F, Sacco K, Duca S, Barletta L, Versari P: Preoperative and intraoperative brain mapping for the resection of eloquent-area tumors. A prospective analysis of methodology, correlation, and usefulness based on clinical outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1835-1846.
3.
Fritsch G, Hitzig E: Ueber die elektrische Erregbarkeit des Grosshirns. Arch Anat Physiol Wissen 1870;37:300-302.
4.
Bartholow R: Experimental investigations into the functions of the human brain. Am J Med Sci 1874;66:305-313.
5.
Penfield W, Boldrey E: Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 1937;60:389-443.
6.
Yingling CD, Ojemann S, Dodson B, Harrington MJ, Berger MS: Identification of motor pathways during tumor surgery facilitated by multichannel electromyographic recording. J Neurosurg 1999;91:922-927.
7.
Berger MS, Ojemann GA, Lettich E: Neurophysiological monitoring during astrocytoma surgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1990;1:65-80.
8.
Kombos T, Suss O: Neurophysiological basis of direct cortical stimulation and applied neuroanatomy of the motor cortex: a review. Neurosurg Focus 2009;27:E3.
9.
Szelenyi A, Bello L, Duffau H, Fava E, Feigl GC, Galanda M, Neuloh G, Signorelli F, Sala F: Intraoperative electrical stimulation in awake craniotomy: methodological aspects of current practice. Neurosurg Focus 2010;28:E7.
10.
Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J: Modification of cortical stimulation for motor-evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 1993;32:219-226.
11.
Szelenyi A, Joksimovic B, Seifert V: Intraoperative risk of seizures associated with transient direct cortical stimulation in patients with symptomatic epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2007;24:39-43.
12.
Szelenyi A, Senft C, Jardan M, Forster MT, Franz K, Seifert V, Vatter H: Intra-operative subcortical electrical stimulation: a comparison of two methods. Clin Neurophysiol 2011;122:1470-1475.
13.
Kombos T, Suess O, Kern BC, Funk T, Hoell T, Kopetsch O, Brock M: Comparison between monopolar and bipolar electrical stimulation of the motor cortex. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:1295-1301.
14.
Neuloh G, Bien CG, Clusmann H, von Lehe M, Schramm J: Continuous motor monitoring enhances functional preservation and seizure-free outcome in surgery for intractable focal epilepsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1307-1314.
15.
Sartorius CJ, Berger MS: Rapid termination of intraoperative stimulation-evoked seizures with application of cold Ringer's lactate to the cortex. Technical note. J Neurosurg 1998;88:349-351.
16.
Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schafer S, Schramm J: Somatosensory-evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery 1996;38:962-970.
17.
Kombos T, Suess O, Ciklatekerlio O, Brock M: Monitoring of intraoperative motor-evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 2001;95:608-614.
18.
Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J: Motor-evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 2004;54:1061-1070, discussion 1070-1072.
19.
Ng WH, Ochi A, Rutka JT, Strantzas S, Holmes L, Otsubo H: Stimulation threshold potentials of intraoperative cortical motor mapping using monopolar trains of five in pediatric epilepsy surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 2010;26:675-679.
20.
Romstock J, Fahlbusch R, Ganslandt O, Nimsky C, Strauss C: Localisation of the sensorimotor cortex during surgery for brain tumours: feasibility and waveform patterns of somatosensory-evoked potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:221-229.
21.
Sartorius CJ, Wright G: Intraoperative brain mapping in a community setting - technical considerations. Surg Neurol 1997;47:380-388.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.