The research into the Drosophila melanogaster sex-determining system has been at the basis of all further research on insect sex determination. This further research has made it clear that, for most insect species, the presence of sufficient functional Transformer (TRA) protein in the early embryonic stage is essential for female sexual development. In Hymenoptera, functional analysis of sex determination by knockdown studies of sex-determining genes has only been performed for 2 species. The first is the social insect species Apis mellifera, the honeybee, which has single-locus complementary sex determination (CSD). The other species is the parasitoid Nasonia vitripennis, the jewel wasp. Nasonia has a non-CSD sex-determining system, described as the maternal effect genomic imprinting sex determination system (MEGISD). Here, we describe the arguments that eventually led to the formulation of MEGISD and the experimental data that supported and refined this model. We evaluate the possibility that DNA methylation lies at the basis of MEGISD and briefly address the role of genomic imprinting in non-CSD sex determination in other Hymenoptera.

Keywords:
doublesex, Genomic imprinting, Haplodiploidy, Maternal effect, Nasonia, Sex determination, transformer
1.
Beukeboom LW: Sex determination in Hymenoptera: a need for genetic and molecular studies. Bioessays 17:813-817 (1995).
2.
Beukeboom LW, Kamping A: No patrigenes required for femaleness in the haplodiploid wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics 172:981-989 (2006).
3.
Beukeboom LW, Kamping A, van de Zande L: Sex determination in the haplodiploid wasp Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea): a critical consideration of models and evidence. Semin Cell Dev Biol 18:371-378 (2007a).
4.
Beukeboom LW, Kamping A, Louter M, Pijnacker LP, Katju V, et al: Haploid females in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Science 315:206 (2007b).
5.
Beye M, Hasselmann M, Fondrk MK, Page RE, Omholt SW: The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honeybee and encodes an SR-type protein. Cell 114:419-429 (2003).
6.
Concha C, Scott MJ: Sexual development in Lucilia cuprina (Diptera, Calliphoridae) is controlled by the transformer gene. Genetics 182:785-798 (2009).
7.
Cook JM: Sex determination in the Hymenoptera: a review of models and evidence. Heredity 71:421-435 (1993).
8.
Crozier R: Evolutionary genetics of the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 22:263-288 (1977).
9.
Cunha ABD, Kerr WE: A genetical hypothesis to explain sex-determination by arrhenotokous parthenogenesis. Forma Functio 1:33-36 (1956).
10.
De Boer JG, Ode PJ, Vet LEM, Whitfield J, Heimpel GE: Complementary sex determination in the parasitoid wasp Cotesia vestalis (C. plutellae). J Evol Biol 20:340-348 (2007).
11.
Dobson SL, Tanouye MA: Evidence for a genomic imprinting sex determination mechanism in Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera; Chalcidoidea). Genetics 149:233-242 (1998).
12.
Erickson JW, Quintero JJ: Indirect effects of ploidy suggest X chromosome dose, not the X:A ratio, signals sex in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 5:e332-e332 (2007).
13.
Friedler G, Ray DT: Androgenesis and mutation in the wasp Mormoniella. Anat Rec 111:475 (1951).
14.
Gempe T, Beye M: Function and evolution of sex determination mechanisms, genes and pathways in insects. Bioessays 33:52-60 (2011).
15.
Gempe T, Hasselmann M, Schiøtt M, Hause G, Otte M, Beye M: Sex determination in honeybees: two separate mechanisms induce and maintain the female pathway. PLoS Biol 7:e1000222 (2009).
16.
Hasselmann M, Gempe T, Schiøtt M, Nunes-Silva CG, Otte M, Beye M: Evidence for the evolutionary nascence of a novel sex determination pathway in honeybees. Nature 454:519-522 (2008).
17.
Hediger M, Henggeler C, Meier N, Perez R, Saccone G, Bopp D: Molecular characterization of the key switch F provides a basis for understanding the rapid divergence of the sex-determining pathway in the housefly. Genetics 184:155-170 (2010).
18.
Heimpel GE, de Boer JG: Sex determination in the Hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 53:209-230 (2008).
19.
Kamping A, Katju V, Beukeboom LW, Werren JH: Inheritance of gynandromorphism in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics 175:1321-1333 (2007).
20.
Kijimoto T, Moczek AP, Andrews J: Diversification of doublesex function underlies morph-, sex-, and species-specific development of beetle horns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:20526-20531 (2012).
21.
Kopp A: Dmrt genes in the development and evolution of sexual dimorphism. Trends Genet 28:175-184 (2012).
22.
Ma WJ, Kuijper B, de Boer JG, van de Zande L, Beukeboom LW, et al: Absence of complementary sex determination in the parasitoid wasp genus Asobara (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). PLoS One 8:e60459 (2013).
23.
Matson CK, Zarkower D: Sex and the singular DM domain: insights into sexual regulation, evolution and plasticity. Nat Rev Genet 13:163-174 (2012).
24.
McKeown M, Belote JM, Baker BS: A molecular analysis of transformer, a gene in Drosophila melanogaster that controls female sexual differentiation. Cell 48:489-499 (1987).
25.
Nur U, Werren JH, Eickbush DG, Burke WD, Eickbush TH: A ‘selfish' B chromosome that enhances its transmission by eliminating the paternal genome. Science 240:512-514 (1988).
26.
Oliveira DCSG, Werren JH, Verhulst EC, Giebel JD, Kamping A, et al: Identification and characterization of the doublesex gene of Nasonia. Insect Mol Biol 18:315-324 (2009).
27.
Pane A, Salvemini M, Delli Bovi P, Polito C, Saccone G: The transformer gene in Ceratitis capitata provides a genetic basis for selecting and remembering the sexual fate. Development 129:3715-3725 (2002).
28.
Park J, Peng Z, Zeng J, Elango N, Park T, et al: Comparative analyses of DNA methylation and sequence evolution using Nasonia genomes. Mol Biol Evol 28:3345-3354 (2011).
29.
Poirié M, Périquet GG, Beukeboom LW: The hymenopteran way of determining sex. Semin Cell Dev Biol 3:357-361 (1992).
30.
Ruiz MF, Milano A, Salvemini M, Eirín-López JM, Perondini ALP, et al: The gene transformer of Anastrepha fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) and its evolution in insects. PLoS One 2:e1239 (2007).
31.
Saccone G, Salvemini M, Polito LC: The transformer gene of Ceratitis capitata: a paradigm for a conserved epigenetic master regulator of sex determination in insects. Genetica 139:99-111 (2011).
32.
Salvemini M, Robertson M, Aronson B, Atkinson P, Polito LCLC, Saccone G: Ceratitis capitata transformer-2 gene is required to establish and maintain the autoregulation of Cctra, the master gene for female sex determination. Int J Dev Biol 53:109-120 (2009).
33.
Salz HK: Sex determination in insects: a binary decision based on alternative splicing. Curr Opin Genet Dev 21:395-400 (2011).
34.
Schmieder S, Colinet D, Poirié M: Tracing back the nascence of a new sex-determination pathway to the ancestor of bees and ants. Nat Commun 3:895 (2012).
35.
Siera SG, Cline TW: Sexual back talk with evolutionary implications: stimulation of the Drosophila sex-determination gene Sex-lethal by its target transformer. Genetics 180:1963-1981 (2008).
36.
Skinner SW, Werren JH: The genetics of sex determination in Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae). Genetics 94:s98 (1980).
37.
Trent C, Crosby C, Eavey J: Additional evidence for the genomic imprinting model of sex determination in the haplodiploid wasp Nasonia vitripennis: isolation of biparental diploid males after X-ray mutagenesis. Heredity 96:368-376 (2006).
38.
Van Wilgenburg E, Driessen G, Beukeboom LW: Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: an ‘unintelligent' design? Front Zool 3:1 (2006).
39.
Verhulst EC, Beukeboom LW, van de Zande L: Maternal control of haplodiploid sex determination in the wasp Nasonia. Science 328:620-623 (2010a).
40.
Verhulst EC, van de Zande L, Beukeboom LW: Insect sex determination: it all evolves around transformer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20:376-383 (2010b).
41.
Verhulst EC, Lynch JA, Bopp D, Beukeboom LW, van de Zande L: A new component of the Nasonia sex determining cascade is maternally silenced and regulates transformer expression. PLoS One 8:e63618 (2013).
42.
Wang W, Yoder JH: Hox-mediated regulation of doublesex sculpts sex-specific abdomen morphology in Drosophila. Dev Dyn 241:1076-1090 (2012).
43.
Werren JH, Gadau J, Beukeboom LW, Desplan C, Lynch J, et al: Proposal to sequence the Nasonia genome [Internet]. (2004). Available from http://www.rochester.edu/college/BIO/labs/WerrenLab/nasonia/LettersOfSupport/NasWhitePaper2004.pdf
44.
Werren JH, Richards S, Desjardins CA, Niehuis O, Gadau J, et al: Functional and evolutionary insights from the genomes of three parasitoid Nasonia species. Science 327:343-348 (2010).
45.
Whiting P: Selective fertilization and sex determination in Hymenoptera. Science 78:537-538 (1933).
46.
Whiting P: Multiple alleles in complementary sex determination of Habrobracon. Genetics 28:365-382 (1943).
47.
Whiting P: Polyploidy in Mormoniella. Genetics 45:949-970 (1960).
48.
Zayed A, Packer L: Complementary sex determination substantially increases extinction proneness of haplodiploid populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10742-10746 (2005).
49.
Zwier MV, Verhulst EC, Zwahlen RD, Beukeboom LW, van de Zande L: DNA methylation plays a crucial role during early Nasonia development. Insect Mol Biol 21:129-138 (2012).
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.