Complex Psychiatry

Review

Free Access

What Have Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics and Metabolomics (Not) Taught Us about Psychiatric Disorders?

Turck C.W. · Filiou M.D.

Author affiliations

Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany

Corresponding Author

Michaela D. Filiou

Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry

Kraepelinstr. 2-10

DE-80804 Munich (Germany)

E-Mail michaela.filiou@gmail.com

Related Articles for ""

Mol Neuropsychiatry 2015;1:69-75

Abstract

Understanding the molecular causes and finding appropriate therapies for psychiatric disorders are challenging tasks for research; -omics technologies are used to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying brain dysfunction in a hypothesis-free manner. In this review, we will focus on mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics and address how these approaches have contributed to our understanding of psychiatric disorders. Specifically, we will discuss what we have learned from mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics studies in rodent models and human cohorts, outline current limitations and discuss the potential of these methods for future applications in psychiatry.

© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel


Introduction

Due to their phenotypic heterogeneity, the lack of accurate diagnostic classification and the absence of molecular correlates which hamper our understanding of disease pathogenesis, psychiatric disorders constitute a challenging field of research. Various hypothesis-free -omics technologies have been used to disentangle the molecular mechanisms underlying psychiatric disorders. In this review, we will discuss the current status of mass spectrometry-based proteomics and metabolomics studies in rodent models and human cohorts. We will mainly focus on anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia as they represent core psychiatric conditions. We will then assess what proteomics and metabolomics studies have delivered for psychiatric research, their limitations and what we can still learn in order to get meaningful results that will help us understand psychiatric disorders.

Proteomics and Metabolomics in Psychiatric Disorders: Current Status

Proteomics and Metabolomics Toolbox

Mass spectrometry is the core technology behind most proteomics and metabolomics approaches [1]. In a disease framework, a mass spectrometry-based proteomics or metabolomics study has a quantitative character and compares the levels of proteins/metabolites between two conditions, namely disease versus control or treatment versus no treatment. In the context of psychiatric disorders, the majority of proteomics studies to date have primarily used two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis and its variations to compare two states (reviewed by Craft et al. [2]). With this technique, equal amounts of protein homogenates from the groups to be compared are loaded on 2D gels, proteins are separated according to both their charge and molecular weight, gels are stained, and gel spots that have different signal intensities between the two groups are processed and sent to the mass spectrometer for protein identification. Stable isotope labeling or label-free approaches have recently been implemented for relative quantification of two states. Stable isotope labeling proteomics is based on introducing heavy stable isotopes (e.g. 2H, 13C, 15N or 18O) into peptides and proteins. Stable isotopes result in a predictable mass difference between a labeled peptide/protein and an unlabeled peptide/protein. Label-free proteomics is based on the assumption that the chromatographic peptide peak area corresponds to its concentration [3]. In both cases, protein extracts are digested, and the resulting peptides are analyzed with mass spectrometry. Mass spectrometry peptide signal intensities, indicative of their abundance, are compared between the two groups with quantification software.

Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics is tailored towards the analysis of small molecules. There are two main approaches: targeted metabolomics, which measures a selected set of metabolites [4], and untargeted metabolomics, which assesses metabolites in an unbiased manner. In the latter approach, not all mass spectrometry signals can be assigned to a metabolite of known structure [5]. In both targeted and untargeted metabolomics, quantification is performed by comparing signal intensities across different sample groups.

Specimens from Animal Models and Human Cohorts

The proteomics and metabolomics toolbox has been applied to animal models representing psychiatric phenotypes with a particular emphasis on rodents. This is due to their straightforward, time-efficient and highly controllable breeding and maintenance combined with the availability of a plethora of test paradigms to assess animal behavior that reflects psychiatric symptoms, relevant secondary read-outs and endophenotypes [6,7]. Work with human brain specimens is inevitably based on postmortem tissue, which presents a number of challenges related to protein and metabolite stability [8]. For clinical translation, peripheral biofluids have received increasing attention. Cerebrospinal fluid is in close proximity to the brain and contains secreted brain-derived proteins and metabolites. Blood/plasma is easily accessible and available for different time points to carry out longitudinal and follow-up analyses. Saliva has been analyzed to compare protein expression differences between patients suffering from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and matching controls [9]. Metabolomics analyses of urine samples have also been performed to study depression [10,11] and effects of antidepressant treatment in rat models [12]. For further proteomics and metabolomics studies in animal models and human cohorts, the reader is referred to several review papers [3,13,14,15,16].

Proteomics and Metabolomics Studies in Psychiatric Disorders: What Have We Learned So Far?

Disease-Relevant Molecular Mechanisms

The hypothesis-free nature of quantitative proteomics and metabolomics methods has revealed molecular mechanisms beyond the neurotransmitter systems that are commonly associated with psychiatric disorders.

Energy Metabolism and Oxidative Stress. An imbalance of major energy metabolism pathways has been demonstrated in brain and peripheral material by proteomics and metabolomics for all major psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia [17,18,19,20], anxiety [21,22], depression [23,24,25] and bipolar disorder [25,26], as well as for pharmacological studies with antidepressants [27,28,29]. In these studies, glycolysis appears to be one of the major pathways affected, in line with the well-established aberrant glucose metabolism in schizophrenia patients [30] and in patients receiving antipsychotic drug treatment [31]. Converging lines of evidence have linked oxidative stress to psychiatric disorders [32]. In anxiety this is supported by -omics findings in mouse models [21,22,33]. Proteomics and metabolomics studies in schizophrenia [19,34,35,36,37] and depression [38] have also reported alterations for protein and metabolite oxidative stress markers.

Other Mitochondrial Functions. In brain tissue, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation has been the predominant mechanism implicated in energy metabolism. Protein expression alterations have been reported for electron transport chain complexes in rodent models of trait anxiety and antidepressant treatment [21,39]. Besides energy metabolism and oxidative stress, alterations in other mitochondrion-related mechanisms and functions have been reported [21,40,41,42]. The majority of these studies have used proteomics approaches, as mitochondrion-specific metabolomics in psychiatry is just beginning to be applied [43]. These studies have revealed alterations in mitochondrial import, transport and structural elements in high versus low trait anxiety mice [21,40], in mitochondrion-orchestrated apoptosis in a mouse model of schizophrenia-like symptoms [41] and in structural mitochondrial components in a methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization mouse model of schizophrenia-related symptoms [42]. These data point towards a causal role of mitochondria in psychiatric disorders extending beyond their role in energy production and oxidative stress regulation, in line with data acquired from other methodologies [44].

Immune System. Proteomics and metabolomics studies have implicated a role for the immune system in brain [45], serum [46], blood [47] and peripheral blood T cells [48] of schizophrenia patients, and in brains of a rat model of depression [49].

Posttranslational Modifications

Apart from alterations in protein expression levels, the tight regulation of disease-related pathways and signaling cascades is orchestrated by protein posttranslational modifications (PTMs) such as phosphorylation and acetylation. Advances in the global analysis of PTMs by mass spectrometry-based proteomics have been reported both for protein characterization and relative quantification [50]. In the field of psychiatry, high-throughput quantitative analysis of PTMs is still in its infancy. Label-free proteomics was used to compare phosphorylation levels in postmortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortices of depressed patients versus control donors [51]. An example of the potential that the study of PTMs holds for elucidating the regulation of molecular events involved in psychiatric phenotypes includes a global quantitative phosphoproteomics analysis based on stable isotope labeling in cells which revealed differences in serotonin receptor phosphorylation when exposed to hallucinogenic versus non-hallucinogenic agonists. These results were also confirmed in vivo in mice [52]. Since hallucinations are a core symptom of schizophrenia, this work may pave the way for more effective treatments of positive symptoms of this disorder.

Network-Based Etiology and Biomarker Panels

Along with the realization that a better understanding of human disease mechanisms requires an investigation of networks [53] in order to gain a holistic view of brain and central nervous system dysfunction [54], modeling tools for pathway changes are used to integrate information acquired from proteomics and metabolomics experiments [55]. The complex molecular underpinnings of psychiatric disorders are reflected by a combination of mild quantitative molecular changes rather than by a few prominent biomarkers. Indeed, alterations identified by proteomics and metabolomics studies include small alterations in protein/metabolite levels that are part of distinct molecular pathways. This pathway-based view may aid the transition to clinical translation, as many protein sequences are not fully conserved between rodents and humans, whereas major neurobiological circuits regulating behavior (i.e. anxiety, reward and fear) are well preserved across vertebrates [56].

Proteomics and Metabolomics in Psychiatric Disorders: What We Have Not Yet Learned

Pathway Activity

Quantitative proteomics and metabolomics approaches provide information on differences in relative protein/metabolite levels in a given experimental setup. Once appropriately analyzed, these data may reveal dysregulated protein/metabolite networks. However, such experiments do not measure the pathway activity or reaction rates of enzymes with altered expression levels. Increased protein/metabolite levels do not necessarily imply an increased pathway activity or vice versa, and this should be taken into account when interpreting proteomics and metabolomics findings. To get insights on pathway activity levels, activity assays for the pathway/process under investigation should be performed.

Causality

The information acquired via proteomics and metabolomics analyses does not specify whether the identified changes in protein and metabolite abundance are a cause or a consequence of disease pathology. At the level of mechanisms/pathways, it is therefore unknown whether affected pathways across different psychiatric conditions represent common causal mechanisms or nonspecific effects of disease manifestation. As -omics methods do not rely on previous molecular knowledge of the condition studied, no conclusions on the cause-effect relationship of the observed changes can be drawn. Moreover, these data cannot always shed light on the underlying biological mechanisms. As an example, increased levels of mitochondrial electron transport chain proteins in a tissue may either indicate a higher number of mitochondria or an increased concentration of electron transport chain molecules in existing mitochondria that may or may not result in higher electron transport activity. To answer such questions, complementary, targeted methodological approaches are required.

Disease-Relevant Alterations in Expression Levels

Technical and biological variability needs to be taken into account in mass spectrometry measurements. The contribution of technical variability to overall variability can be estimated a priori by testing the repeatability of the workflow employed (i.e. sample preparation and accuracy of instrumentation) [57,58,59]. It is important that technical variability is addressed for each workflow employed [60] as well as for the sample type studied [61], as sample complexity has been shown to affect relative variability in quantification [57]. Biological variability is more difficult to estimate a priori. Each proteomics or metabolomics experiment should be able to answer the question, ‘Which of the observed changes in protein/metabolite levels are disease relevant, and which are within the range of physiological variability across different subjects?' This can be achieved by assessing the method to be employed in combination with the material to be studied [62]. Disease-relevant changes in expression levels can be reported with confidence provided they are higher than the method variability together with the normal biological variation of the study sample. Numerous studies have reported fold changes that lie within the technical variability range, and these results are not reliable. It should also be noted that metabolite levels are highly sensitive to external stimuli, and therefore small fold changes may be of no relevance to disease pathology. Taken together, all of these parameters should be taken into account to establish clear-cut fold change thresholds for reporting meaningful results.

Implementation

Perhaps the most serious issue that needs to be addressed in the -omics field as a whole is the implementation of the acquired results. The enthusiasm for the advances in mass spectrometry instrumentation and application was followed by a disillusionment concerning the disproportionately small number of mass spectrometry-based clinical applications. Especially in the field of psychiatric disorders, there is admittedly a discontinuity between technical advances in the instrumentation and the implementation of the acquired knowledge with regard to disease understanding and development of effective treatments [63]. Although an enormous amount of raw data is generated, validation and follow-up studies for proteomics and metabolomics findings are rare, which may be due to a lack of highly accurate alternative methods to validate mass spectrometry data. What is also needed for clinical translation are consortia and initiatives to approach psychiatric disorders from a multidisciplinary point of view.

Proteomics and Metabolomics in Psychiatric Disorders: What We Can Still Learn

Molecular Signatures

Proteomics and metabolomics are powerful systemic and hypothesis-free approaches able to identify state-specific molecular signatures. These molecular fingerprints can be characteristic of disease presence, disease progression, response to treatment, remission or relapse. Of increasing importance is the identification of these signatures in peripheral biofluids for translational applications. Indeed, distinct metabolic signatures have been found by mass spectrometry -omics in plasma [64,65,66], serum [46,67,68] and peripheral blood mononuclear cells [19,69] of patients suffering from major psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorder) compared to control subjects. Furthermore, distinct metabolic signatures before and after antipsychotic treatment have been identified in plasma of patients with schizophrenia [67]. Intriguingly, it has also been suggested that disease-specific protein profiles can be detected in serum before disease onset for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder [70], whereas different metabolic profiles have been observed between patients suffering from depression with and without early-life stress [66]. Proteome profile comparison has also revealed differences in protein expression in fibroblasts from schizophrenia patients and controls [71].

Towards this goal, proteomics and metabolomics molecular signatures will be of great value to define subcategories not only for the presence or absence of a disease but also for predisposing factors, environmental effects and response to treatment. Markers with altered levels both in the brain and in the periphery are fundamental for clinical implementation. A protein that has been found to be consistently downregulated in brain, cerebrospinal fluid and red blood cells in schizophrenia is apolipoprotein A [72]. However, confirming mitochondrial energy metabolism as an underlying molecular mechanism for psychiatric disorders in peripheral tissue may be challenging, since mitochondria are not present in plasma and mitochondrial proteins can only be found in a secreted form. The combination of both proteomics- and metabolomics-derived signatures will be extremely powerful as they relate to the end point of the molecular expression of a disease. As different psychiatric disorders are hard to distinguish with existing diagnostic criteria [73], these molecular signatures will also pave the way for molecular diagnostics in peripheral material as a part of a coordinated effort between clinicians, psychologists and laboratory scientists.

Protein Turnover

Comparative proteomics and metabolomics provide a highly accurate quantitative snapshot of a steady state. Protein expression at a given time point is the result of the equilibrium between protein synthesis and degradation referred to as protein turnover. Dynamic information from the crosstalk between these two processes will provide crucial insights into protein fate in psychiatric disorders and may to some extent explain why protein differences between disease and control states exist. Proteomics-based workflows have been devised to study protein turnover by partial in vivo labeling of mice with 15N and calculating the ratios of the 15N-labeled, newly synthesized fraction to the unlabeled protein fraction. A workflow to investigate protein turnover in a high-throughput manner has recently been described [74]. Efforts towards implementing this technology at the levels of both sample preparation and data analysis algorithms are ongoing [75]. Since protein aggregates resulting from aberrant protein turnover are a hallmark of major psychiatric disorders [76] and alterations in proteostatic mechanisms that regulate protein turnover such as the ubiquitin proteasome system have been reported in anxiety and schizophrenia [33,77], protein turnover studies hold great promise for unraveling pathogenesis-related mechanisms.

Pharmacological Targeting

The sensitive changes in abundance that these methods are able to detect at the pathway level in a quantifiable manner provide valuable insights into the perturbation the system undergoes. Quantitative proteomics and metabolomics have revealed alterations in protein and metabolite levels relevant for psychiatric disorders. Pharmacological manipulation may be possible in vivo by administering substances that selectively target these molecular alterations in rodent models and by assessing whether a reversal of the disease behavioral phenotype can be achieved. Monitoring the effects of selectively manipulating molecular pathways will enable mechanism-based, data-driven, targeted pharmacological studies that will reveal new molecular targets which can eventually be used for clinical translation.

Conclusions

Regardless of the amount and significance of data acquired with individual methodologies, interdisciplinary approaches that provide different types of information are imperative. Genomics, transcriptomics, microRNAs and imaging techniques including mass spectrometry-based imaging [78,79] are complementary tools to understand how the brain (mal)functions and may eventually succeed in delivering accurate disease diagnoses and an informed choice of treatment strategies.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by a DFG grant to M.D.F. (FI 1895/1-1) and the Max Planck Society.

Disclosure Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.



Related Articles:


References

  1. Di Girolamo F, Lante I, Muraca M, Putignani L: The role of mass spectrometry in the ‘omics' era. Curr Org Chem 2013;17:2891-2905.
  2. Craft GE, Chen A, Nairn AC: Recent advances in quantitative neuroproteomics. Methods 2013;61:186-218.
  3. Filiou MD, Martins-de-Souza D, Guest PC, Bahn S, Turck CW: To label or not to label: applications of quantitative proteomics in neuroscience research. Proteomics 2012;12:736-747.
  4. Patti GJ, Yanes O, Siuzdak G: Metabolomics: the apogee of the omics trilogy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012;13:263-269.
  5. Dunn WB, Erban A, Weber RJM, Creek DJ, Brown M, Breitling R, Hankemeier T, Goodacre R, Neumann S, Kopka J, Viant MR: Mass appeal: metabolite identification in mass spectrometry-focused untargeted metabolomics. Metabolomics 2013;9:S44-S66.
    External Resources
  6. Seong E, Seasholtz AF, Burmeister M: Mouse models for psychiatric disorders. Trends Genet 2002;18:643-650.
  7. Gass P, Wotjak C: Rodent models of psychiatric disorders - practical considerations. Cell Tissue Res 2013;354:1-7.
  8. Lewis DA: The human brain revisited: opportunities and challenges in postmortem studies of psychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002;26:143-154.
  9. Iauarone F, Melis M, Platania G, Cabras T, Manconi B, Petruzzelli R, Cordaro M, Siracusano A, Faa G, Messana I, Zanasi M, Castagnola M: Characterization of salivary proteins of schizophrenic and bipolar disorder patients by top-down proteomics. J Proteomics 2014;103:15-22.
  10. Zhang FX, Jia ZH, Gao P, Kong HW, Li X, Lu X, Wu YL, Xu GW: Metabonomics study of urine and plasma in depression and excess fatigue rats by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled with ion trap-time of flight mass spectrometry. Mol Biosyst 2010;6:852-861.
  11. Zheng SN, Yu MY, Lu XM, Huo TG, Ge L, Yang JY, Wu CF, Li FM: Urinary metabonomic study on biochemical changes in chronic unpredictable mild stress model of depression. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:204-209.
  12. Su ZH, Li SQ, Zou GA, Yu CY, Sun YG, Zhang HW, Gu Y, Zou ZM: Urinary metabonomics study of anti-depressive effect of Chaihu-Shu-Gan-San on an experimental model of depression induced by chronic variable stress in rats. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2011;55:533-539.
  13. Filiou MD, Turck CW, Martins-de-Souza D: Quantitative proteomics for investigating psychiatric disorders. Proteomics Clin Appl 2011;5:38-49.
  14. Quinones MP, Kaddurah-Daouk R: Metabolomics tools for identifying biomarkers for neuropsychiatric diseases. Neurobiol Dis 2009;35:165-176.
  15. Martins-de-Souza D, Guest PC, Rahmoune H, Bahn S: Proteomic approaches to unravel the complexity of schizophrenia. Expert Rev Proteomics 2012;9:97-108.
  16. Kaddurah-Daouk R, Krishnan KRR: Metabolomics: a global biochemical approach to the study of central nervous system diseases. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009;34:173-186.
  17. Martins-de-Souza D, Gattaz WF, Schmitt A, Novello JC, Marangoni S, Turck CW, Dias-Neto E: Proteome analysis of schizophrenia patients Wernicke's area reveals an energy metabolism dysregulation. BMC Psychiatry 2009;9:17.
  18. Wood PL, Filiou MD, Otte DM, Zimmer A, Turck CW: Lipidomics reveals dysfunctional glycosynapses in schizophrenia and the G72/G30 transgenic mouse. Schizophr Res 2014;159:365-369.
  19. Liu ML, Zheng P, Liu Z, Xu Y, Mu J, Guo J, Huang T, Meng HQ, Xie P: GC-MS based metabolomics identification of possible novel biomarkers for schizophrenia in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Mol Biosyst 2014;10:2398-2406.
  20. Martins-de-Souza D, Maccarrone G, Wobrock T, Zerr I, Gormanns P, Reckow S, Falkai P, Schmitt A, Turck CW: Proteome analysis of the thalamus and cerebrospinal fluid reveals glycolysis dysfunction and potential biomarkers candidates for schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 2010;44:1176-1189.
  21. Filiou MD, Zhang Y, Teplytska L, Reckow S, Gormanns P, Maccarrone G, Frank E, Kessler MS, Hambsch B, Nussbaumer M, Bunck M, Ludwig T, Yassouridis A, Holsboer F, Landgraf R, Turck CW: Proteomics and metabolomics analysis of a trait anxiety mouse model reveals divergent mitochondrial pathways. Biol Psychiatry 2011;70:1074-1082.
  22. Filiou MD, Asara JM, Nussbaumer M, Teplytska L, Landgraf R, Turck CW: Behavioral extremes of trait anxiety in mice are characterized by distinct metabolic profiles. J Psychiatr Res 2014;58:115-122.
  23. Yang Y, Yang D, Tang G, Zhou C, Cheng K, Zhou J, Wu B, Peng Y, Liu C, Zhan Y, Chen J, Cheng G, Xie P: Proteomics reveals energy and glutathione metabolic dysregulation in the prefrontal cortex of a rat model of depression. Neuroscience 2013;247:191-200.
  24. Plubelli C, Carboni L, Becchi S, Mathe AA, Domenici E: Regulation of cytoskeleton machinery, neurogenesis and energy metabolism pathways in a rat gene-environment model of depression revealed by proteomic analysis. Neuroscience 2011;176:349-380.
  25. Beasley CL, Pennington K, Behan A, Wait R, Dunn MJ, Cotter D: Proteomic analysis of the anterior cingulate cortex in the major psychiatric disorders: evidence for disease-associated changes. Proteomics 2006;6:3414-3425.
  26. Kazuno A, Ohtawa K, Otsuki K, Usui M, Sugawara H, Okazaki Y, Kato T: Proteomic analysis of lymphoblastoid cells derived from monozygotic twins discordant for bipolar disorder: a preliminary study. PLoS One 2013;8:e53855.
  27. Webhofer C, Gormanns P, Reckow S, Lebar M, Maccarrone G, Ludwig T, Putz B, Asara JM, Holsboer F, Sillaber I, Zieglgänsberger W, Turck CW: Proteomic and metabolomic profiling reveals time-dependent changes in hippocampal metabolism upon paroxetine treatment and biomarker candidates. J Psychiatr Res 2013;47:289-298.
  28. Webhofer C, Gormanns P, Tolstikov V, Zieglgänsberger W, Sillaber I, Holsboer F, Turck CW: Metabolite profiling of antidepressant drug action reveals novel drug targets beyond monoamine elevation. Transl Psychiatry 2011;1:e58.
  29. Weckmann K, Labermaier C, Asara JM, Müller MB, Turck CW: Time-dependent metabolomic profiling of ketamine drug action reveals hippocampal pathway alterations and biomarker candidates. Transl Psychiatry 2014;4:e481.
  30. Harris LW, Guest PC, Wayland MT, Umrania Y, Krishnamurthy D, Rahmoune H, Bahn S: Schizophrenia: metabolic aspects of aetiology, diagnosis and future treatment strategies. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013;38:752-766.
  31. Scheen AJ, De Hert MA: Abnormal glucose metabolism in patients treated with antipsychotics. Diabetes Metab 2007;33:169-175.
  32. Ng F, Berk M, Dean O, Bush AI: Oxidative stress in psychiatric disorders: evidence base and therapeutic implications. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008;11:851-876.
  33. Szego EM, Janáky T, Szabó Z, Csorba A, Kompagne H, Müller G, Lévay G, Simor A, Juhász G, Kékesi KA: A mouse model of anxiety molecularly characterized by altered protein networks in the brain proteome. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2010;20:96-111.
  34. Filiou MD, Teplytska L, Otte DM, Zimmer A, Turck CW: Myelination and oxidative stress alterations in the cerebellum of the G72/G30 transgenic schizophrenia mouse model. J Psychiatr Res 2012;46:1359-1365.
  35. Prabakaran S, Swatton JE, Ryan MM, Huffaker SJ, Huang JTJ, Griffin JL, Wayland M, Freeman T, Dudbridge F, Lilley KS, Karp NA, Hester S, Tkachev D, Mimmack ML, Yolken RH, Webster MJ, Torrey EF, Bahn S: Mitochondrial dysfunction in schizophrenia: evidence for compromised brain metabolism and oxidative stress. Mol Psychiatry 2004;9:684-697.
  36. Prabakaran S, Wengenroth M, Lockstone HE, Lilley K, Leweke FM, Bahn S: 2-D DIGE analysis of liver and red blood cells provides further evidence for oxidative stress in schizophrenia. J Proteome Res 2007;6:141-149.
  37. Martins-de-Souza D, Harris LW, Guest PC, Bahn S: The role of energy metabolism dysfunction and oxidative stress in schizophrenia revealed by proteomics. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011;15:2067-2079.
  38. Marais L, Hattingh SM, Stein DJ, Daniels WM: A proteomic analysis of the ventral hippocampus of rats subjected to maternal separation and escitalopram treatment. Metab Brain Dis 2009;24:569-586.
  39. Ji BH, La YJ, Gao LH, Zhu H, Tian N, Zhang M, Yang YF, Zhao XZ, Tang RQ, Ma G, Zhou J, Meng JW, Ma J, Zhang Z, Li HF, Feng GY, Wang YJ, He L, Wan CL: A comparative proteomics analysis of rat mitochondria from the cerebral cortex and hippocampus in response to antipsychotic medications. J Proteome Res 2009;8:3633-3641.
  40. Iris F, Filiou M, Turck CW: Differential proteomics analyses reveal anxiety-associated molecular and cellular mechanisms in cingulate cortex synapses. Am J Psychiatry Neurosci 2014;2:25-42.
  41. Otte DM, Sommersberg B, Kudin A, Guerrero C, Albayram O, Filiou MD, Frisch P, Yilmaz O, Drews E, Turck CW, Bilkei-Gorzó A, Kunz WS, Beck H, Zimmer A: N-acetyl cysteine treatment rescues cognitive deficits induced by mitochondrial dysfunction in G72/G30 transgenic mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011;36:2233-2243.
  42. Iwazaki T, McGregor IS, Matsumoto I: Protein expression profile in the amygdala of rats with methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Neurosci Lett 2008;435:113-119.
  43. McClay JL, Adkins DE, Vunck SA, Batman AM, Vann RE, Clark SL, Beardsley PM, van den Oord EJ: Large-scale neurochemical metabolomics analysis identifies multiple compounds associated with methamphetamine exposure. Metabolomics 2013;9:392-402.
  44. Clay HB, Sillivan S, Konradi C: Mitochondrial dysfunction and pathology in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Int J Dev Neurosci 2011;29:311-324.
  45. Martins-de-Souza D, Gattaz WF, Schmitt A, Rewerts C, Maccarrone G, Dias-Neto E, Turck CW: Prefrontal cortex shotgun proteome analysis reveals altered calcium homeostasis and immune system imbalance in schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009;259:151-163.
  46. Li Y, Zhou KJ, Zhang Z, Sun LY, Yang JL, Zhang M, Ji BH, Tang KF, Wei ZY, He G, Gao LH, Yang L, Wang P, Yang P, Feng GY, He L, Wan CL: Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis reveals dysfunction of complement pathway in peripheral blood of schizophrenia patients: evidence for the immune hypothesis of schizophrenia. Mol Biosyst 2012;8:2664-2671.
  47. Herberth M, Rahmoune H, Schwarz E, Koethe D, Harris LW, Kranaster L, Witt SH, Spain M, Barnes A, Schmolz M, Leweke MF, Guest PC, Bahn S: Identification of a molecular profile associated with immune status in first-onset schizophrenia patients. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses 2014;7:207-215.
  48. Craddock RM, Huang JT, Jackson E, Harris N, Torrey EF, Herberth M, Bahn S: Increased α-defensins as a blood marker for schizophrenia susceptibility. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008;7:1204-1213.
  49. Bisgaard CF, Bak S, Christensen T, Jensen ON, Enghild JJ, Wiborg O: Vesicular signalling and immune modulation as hedonic fingerprints: proteomic profiling in the chronic mild stress depression model. J Psychopharmacol 2012;26:1569-1583.
  50. Olsen JV, Mann M: Status of large-scale analysis of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2013;12:3444-3452.
  51. Martins-de-Souza D, Guest PC, Vanattou-Saifoudine N, Rahmoune H, Bahn S: Phosphoproteomic differences in major depressive disorder postmortem brains indicate effects on synaptic function. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012;262:657-666.
  52. Karaki S, Becamel C, Murat S, Mannoury la Cour C, Millan MJ, Prézeau L, Bockaert J, Marin P, Vandermoere F: Quantitative phosphoproteomics unravels biased phosphorylation of serotonin 2A receptor at Ser280 by hallucinogenic versus nonhallucinogenic agonists. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014;13:1273-1285.
  53. Barabási AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J: Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:56-68.
  54. Qureshi IA, Mehler MF: Towards a ‘systems'-level understanding of the nervous system and its disorders. Trends Neurosci 2013;36:674-684.
  55. Turck CW, Iris F: Proteome-based pathway modelling of psychiatric disorders. Pharmacopsychiatry 2011;44:S54-S61.
  56. Gross CT, Canteras NS: The many paths to fear. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012;13:651-658.
  57. Filiou MD, Soukupova M, Rewerts C, Webhofer C, Turck CW, Maccarrone G: Variability assessment of 15N metabolic labeling-based proteomics workflow in mouse plasma and brain. Mol Biosyst 2015, Epub ahead of print.
  58. Russell MR, Lilley KS: Pipeline to assess the greatest source of technical variance in quantitative proteomics using metabolic labelling. J Proteomics 2012;77:441-454.
  59. Masson P, Spagou K, Nicholson JK, Want EJ: Technical and biological variation in UPLC-MS-based untargeted metabolic profiling of liver extracts: application in an experimental toxicity study on galactosamine. Anal Chem 2011;83:1116-1123.
  60. Choe LH, Lee KH: Quantitative and qualitative measure of intralaboratory two-dimensional protein gel reproducibility and the effects of sample preparation, sample load, and image analysis. Electrophoresis 2003;24:3500-3507.
  61. Pallen C: Technical variability of 2D gel electrophoresis - application to soybean allergens. Toxicol Rep 2014;1:734-742.
    External Resources
  62. Stoop MP, Coulier L, Rosenling T, Shi S, Smolinska AM, Buydens L, Ampt K, Stingl C, Dane A, Muilwijk B, Luitwieler RL, Sillevis Smitt PA, Hintzen RQ, Bischoff R, Wijmenga SS, Hankemeier T, van Gool AJ, Luider TM: Quantitative proteomics and metabolomics analysis of normal human cerebrospinal fluid samples. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010;9:2063-2075.
  63. Hyman SE: Revolution stalled. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:155cm11.
  64. He Y, Yu Z, Giegling I, Xie L, Hartmann AM, Prehn C, Adamski J, Kahn R, Li Y, Illig T, Wang-Sattler R, Rujescu D: Schizophrenia shows a unique metabolomics signature in plasma. Transl Psychiatry 2012;2:e149.
  65. Paige L, Mitchell MW, Krishnan RR, Kaddurah-Daouk R, Steffens DC: A preliminary metabolomic analysis of older adults with and without depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006;31:S107-S108.
  66. Ding XH, Yang SG, Li WJ, Liu Y, Li ZG, Zhang Y, Li LJ, Liu SJ: The potential biomarker panels for identification of major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with and without early life stress (ELS) by metabonomic analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e97479.
  67. Xuan J, Pan G, Qiu Y, Yang L, Su M, Liu Y, Chen J, Feng G, Fang Y, Jia W, Xing Q, He L: Metabolomic profiling to identify potential serum biomarkers for schizophrenia and risperidone action. J Proteome Res 2011;10:5433-5443.
  68. Orešič M, Tang J, Seppänen-Laakso T, Mattila I, Saarni SE, Saarni SI, Lönnqvist J, Sysi-Aho M, Hyötyläinen T, Perälä J, Suvisaari J: Metabolome in schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: a general population-based study. Genome Med 2011;3:19.
  69. Herberth M, Koethe D, Levin Y, Schwarz E, Krzyszton ND, Schoeffmann S, Ruh H, Rahmoune H, Kranaster L, Schoenborn T, Leweke MF, Guest PC, Bahn S: Peripheral profiling analysis for bipolar disorder reveals markers associated with reduced cell survival. Proteomics 2011;11:94-105.
  70. Schwarz E, Guest PC, Rahmoune H, Martins-de-Souza D, Niebuhr DW, Weber NS, Cowan DN, Yolken RH, Spain M, Barnes A, Bahn S: Identification of a blood-based biological signature in subjects with psychiatric disorders prior to clinical manifestation. World J Biol Psychiatry 2012;13:627-632.
  71. Wang L, Lockstone HE, Guest PC, Levin Y, Palotás A, Pietsch S, Schwarz E, Rahmoune H, Harris LW, Ma D, Bahn S: Expression profiling of fibroblasts identifies cell cycle abnormalities in schizophrenia. J Proteome Res 2010;9:521-527.
  72. Huang JT, Wang L, Prabakaran S, Wengenroth M, Lockstone HE, Koethe D, Gerth CW, Gross S, Schreiber D, Lilley K, Wayland M, Oxley D, Leweke FM, Bahn S: Independent protein-profiling studies show a decrease in apolipoprotein A1 levels in schizophrenia CSF, brain and peripheral tissues. Mol Psychiatry 2008;13:1118-1128.
  73. Cosgrove VE, Suppes T: Informing DSM-5: biological boundaries between bipolar I disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia. BMC Med 2013;11:127.
  74. Reckow S, Webhofer C: Analysis of individual protein turnover in live animals on a proteome-wide scale. Methods Mol Biol 2014;1156:147-154.
  75. Hsieh EJ, Shulman NJ, Dai DF, Vincow ES, Karunadharma PP, Pallanck L, Rabinovitch PS, Maccoss MJ: Topograph, a software platform for precursor enrichment corrected global protein turnover measurements. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012;11:1468-1474.
  76. Korth C: Aggregated proteins in schizophrenia and other chronic mental diseases: DISC1opathies. Prion 2012;6:134-141.
  77. Rubio MD, Wood K, Haroutunian V, Meador-Woodruff JH: Dysfunction of the ubiquitin proteasome and ubiquitin-like systems in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38:1910-1920.
  78. Rubakhin SS, Hatcher NG, Monroe EB, Heien ML, Sweedler JV: Mass spectrometric imaging of the nervous system. Curr Pharm Design 2007;13:3325-3334.
  79. Steinhauser ML, Bailey AP, Senyo SE, Guillermier C, Perlstein TS, Gould AP, Lee RT, Lechene CP: Multi-isotope imaging mass spectrometry quantifies stem cell division and metabolism. Nature 2012;481:516-519.

Author Contacts

Michaela D. Filiou

Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry

Kraepelinstr. 2-10

DE-80804 Munich (Germany)

E-Mail michaela.filiou@gmail.com


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Review

Received: December 04, 2014
Accepted: March 25, 2015
Published online: May 12, 2015
Issue release date: July 2015

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 2673-3005 (Print)
eISSN: 2673-298X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CXP


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Di Girolamo F, Lante I, Muraca M, Putignani L: The role of mass spectrometry in the ‘omics' era. Curr Org Chem 2013;17:2891-2905.
  2. Craft GE, Chen A, Nairn AC: Recent advances in quantitative neuroproteomics. Methods 2013;61:186-218.
  3. Filiou MD, Martins-de-Souza D, Guest PC, Bahn S, Turck CW: To label or not to label: applications of quantitative proteomics in neuroscience research. Proteomics 2012;12:736-747.
  4. Patti GJ, Yanes O, Siuzdak G: Metabolomics: the apogee of the omics trilogy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012;13:263-269.
  5. Dunn WB, Erban A, Weber RJM, Creek DJ, Brown M, Breitling R, Hankemeier T, Goodacre R, Neumann S, Kopka J, Viant MR: Mass appeal: metabolite identification in mass spectrometry-focused untargeted metabolomics. Metabolomics 2013;9:S44-S66.
    External Resources
  6. Seong E, Seasholtz AF, Burmeister M: Mouse models for psychiatric disorders. Trends Genet 2002;18:643-650.
  7. Gass P, Wotjak C: Rodent models of psychiatric disorders - practical considerations. Cell Tissue Res 2013;354:1-7.
  8. Lewis DA: The human brain revisited: opportunities and challenges in postmortem studies of psychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002;26:143-154.
  9. Iauarone F, Melis M, Platania G, Cabras T, Manconi B, Petruzzelli R, Cordaro M, Siracusano A, Faa G, Messana I, Zanasi M, Castagnola M: Characterization of salivary proteins of schizophrenic and bipolar disorder patients by top-down proteomics. J Proteomics 2014;103:15-22.
  10. Zhang FX, Jia ZH, Gao P, Kong HW, Li X, Lu X, Wu YL, Xu GW: Metabonomics study of urine and plasma in depression and excess fatigue rats by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled with ion trap-time of flight mass spectrometry. Mol Biosyst 2010;6:852-861.
  11. Zheng SN, Yu MY, Lu XM, Huo TG, Ge L, Yang JY, Wu CF, Li FM: Urinary metabonomic study on biochemical changes in chronic unpredictable mild stress model of depression. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:204-209.
  12. Su ZH, Li SQ, Zou GA, Yu CY, Sun YG, Zhang HW, Gu Y, Zou ZM: Urinary metabonomics study of anti-depressive effect of Chaihu-Shu-Gan-San on an experimental model of depression induced by chronic variable stress in rats. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2011;55:533-539.
  13. Filiou MD, Turck CW, Martins-de-Souza D: Quantitative proteomics for investigating psychiatric disorders. Proteomics Clin Appl 2011;5:38-49.
  14. Quinones MP, Kaddurah-Daouk R: Metabolomics tools for identifying biomarkers for neuropsychiatric diseases. Neurobiol Dis 2009;35:165-176.
  15. Martins-de-Souza D, Guest PC, Rahmoune H, Bahn S: Proteomic approaches to unravel the complexity of schizophrenia. Expert Rev Proteomics 2012;9:97-108.
  16. Kaddurah-Daouk R, Krishnan KRR: Metabolomics: a global biochemical approach to the study of central nervous system diseases. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009;34:173-186.
  17. Martins-de-Souza D, Gattaz WF, Schmitt A, Novello JC, Marangoni S, Turck CW, Dias-Neto E: Proteome analysis of schizophrenia patients Wernicke's area reveals an energy metabolism dysregulation. BMC Psychiatry 2009;9:17.
  18. Wood PL, Filiou MD, Otte DM, Zimmer A, Turck CW: Lipidomics reveals dysfunctional glycosynapses in schizophrenia and the G72/G30 transgenic mouse. Schizophr Res 2014;159:365-369.
  19. Liu ML, Zheng P, Liu Z, Xu Y, Mu J, Guo J, Huang T, Meng HQ, Xie P: GC-MS based metabolomics identification of possible novel biomarkers for schizophrenia in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Mol Biosyst 2014;10:2398-2406.
  20. Martins-de-Souza D, Maccarrone G, Wobrock T, Zerr I, Gormanns P, Reckow S, Falkai P, Schmitt A, Turck CW: Proteome analysis of the thalamus and cerebrospinal fluid reveals glycolysis dysfunction and potential biomarkers candidates for schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 2010;44:1176-1189.
  21. Filiou MD, Zhang Y, Teplytska L, Reckow S, Gormanns P, Maccarrone G, Frank E, Kessler MS, Hambsch B, Nussbaumer M, Bunck M, Ludwig T, Yassouridis A, Holsboer F, Landgraf R, Turck CW: Proteomics and metabolomics analysis of a trait anxiety mouse model reveals divergent mitochondrial pathways. Biol Psychiatry 2011;70:1074-1082.
  22. Filiou MD, Asara JM, Nussbaumer M, Teplytska L, Landgraf R, Turck CW: Behavioral extremes of trait anxiety in mice are characterized by distinct metabolic profiles. J Psychiatr Res 2014;58:115-122.
  23. Yang Y, Yang D, Tang G, Zhou C, Cheng K, Zhou J, Wu B, Peng Y, Liu C, Zhan Y, Chen J, Cheng G, Xie P: Proteomics reveals energy and glutathione metabolic dysregulation in the prefrontal cortex of a rat model of depression. Neuroscience 2013;247:191-200.
  24. Plubelli C, Carboni L, Becchi S, Mathe AA, Domenici E: Regulation of cytoskeleton machinery, neurogenesis and energy metabolism pathways in a rat gene-environment model of depression revealed by proteomic analysis. Neuroscience 2011;176:349-380.
  25. Beasley CL, Pennington K, Behan A, Wait R, Dunn MJ, Cotter D: Proteomic analysis of the anterior cingulate cortex in the major psychiatric disorders: evidence for disease-associated changes. Proteomics 2006;6:3414-3425.
  26. Kazuno A, Ohtawa K, Otsuki K, Usui M, Sugawara H, Okazaki Y, Kato T: Proteomic analysis of lymphoblastoid cells derived from monozygotic twins discordant for bipolar disorder: a preliminary study. PLoS One 2013;8:e53855.
  27. Webhofer C, Gormanns P, Reckow S, Lebar M, Maccarrone G, Ludwig T, Putz B, Asara JM, Holsboer F, Sillaber I, Zieglgänsberger W, Turck CW: Proteomic and metabolomic profiling reveals time-dependent changes in hippocampal metabolism upon paroxetine treatment and biomarker candidates. J Psychiatr Res 2013;47:289-298.
  28. Webhofer C, Gormanns P, Tolstikov V, Zieglgänsberger W, Sillaber I, Holsboer F, Turck CW: Metabolite profiling of antidepressant drug action reveals novel drug targets beyond monoamine elevation. Transl Psychiatry 2011;1:e58.
  29. Weckmann K, Labermaier C, Asara JM, Müller MB, Turck CW: Time-dependent metabolomic profiling of ketamine drug action reveals hippocampal pathway alterations and biomarker candidates. Transl Psychiatry 2014;4:e481.
  30. Harris LW, Guest PC, Wayland MT, Umrania Y, Krishnamurthy D, Rahmoune H, Bahn S: Schizophrenia: metabolic aspects of aetiology, diagnosis and future treatment strategies. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013;38:752-766.
  31. Scheen AJ, De Hert MA: Abnormal glucose metabolism in patients treated with antipsychotics. Diabetes Metab 2007;33:169-175.
  32. Ng F, Berk M, Dean O, Bush AI: Oxidative stress in psychiatric disorders: evidence base and therapeutic implications. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008;11:851-876.
  33. Szego EM, Janáky T, Szabó Z, Csorba A, Kompagne H, Müller G, Lévay G, Simor A, Juhász G, Kékesi KA: A mouse model of anxiety molecularly characterized by altered protein networks in the brain proteome. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2010;20:96-111.
  34. Filiou MD, Teplytska L, Otte DM, Zimmer A, Turck CW: Myelination and oxidative stress alterations in the cerebellum of the G72/G30 transgenic schizophrenia mouse model. J Psychiatr Res 2012;46:1359-1365.
  35. Prabakaran S, Swatton JE, Ryan MM, Huffaker SJ, Huang JTJ, Griffin JL, Wayland M, Freeman T, Dudbridge F, Lilley KS, Karp NA, Hester S, Tkachev D, Mimmack ML, Yolken RH, Webster MJ, Torrey EF, Bahn S: Mitochondrial dysfunction in schizophrenia: evidence for compromised brain metabolism and oxidative stress. Mol Psychiatry 2004;9:684-697.
  36. Prabakaran S, Wengenroth M, Lockstone HE, Lilley K, Leweke FM, Bahn S: 2-D DIGE analysis of liver and red blood cells provides further evidence for oxidative stress in schizophrenia. J Proteome Res 2007;6:141-149.
  37. Martins-de-Souza D, Harris LW, Guest PC, Bahn S: The role of energy metabolism dysfunction and oxidative stress in schizophrenia revealed by proteomics. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011;15:2067-2079.
  38. Marais L, Hattingh SM, Stein DJ, Daniels WM: A proteomic analysis of the ventral hippocampus of rats subjected to maternal separation and escitalopram treatment. Metab Brain Dis 2009;24:569-586.
  39. Ji BH, La YJ, Gao LH, Zhu H, Tian N, Zhang M, Yang YF, Zhao XZ, Tang RQ, Ma G, Zhou J, Meng JW, Ma J, Zhang Z, Li HF, Feng GY, Wang YJ, He L, Wan CL: A comparative proteomics analysis of rat mitochondria from the cerebral cortex and hippocampus in response to antipsychotic medications. J Proteome Res 2009;8:3633-3641.
  40. Iris F, Filiou M, Turck CW: Differential proteomics analyses reveal anxiety-associated molecular and cellular mechanisms in cingulate cortex synapses. Am J Psychiatry Neurosci 2014;2:25-42.
  41. Otte DM, Sommersberg B, Kudin A, Guerrero C, Albayram O, Filiou MD, Frisch P, Yilmaz O, Drews E, Turck CW, Bilkei-Gorzó A, Kunz WS, Beck H, Zimmer A: N-acetyl cysteine treatment rescues cognitive deficits induced by mitochondrial dysfunction in G72/G30 transgenic mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011;36:2233-2243.
  42. Iwazaki T, McGregor IS, Matsumoto I: Protein expression profile in the amygdala of rats with methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Neurosci Lett 2008;435:113-119.
  43. McClay JL, Adkins DE, Vunck SA, Batman AM, Vann RE, Clark SL, Beardsley PM, van den Oord EJ: Large-scale neurochemical metabolomics analysis identifies multiple compounds associated with methamphetamine exposure. Metabolomics 2013;9:392-402.
  44. Clay HB, Sillivan S, Konradi C: Mitochondrial dysfunction and pathology in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Int J Dev Neurosci 2011;29:311-324.
  45. Martins-de-Souza D, Gattaz WF, Schmitt A, Rewerts C, Maccarrone G, Dias-Neto E, Turck CW: Prefrontal cortex shotgun proteome analysis reveals altered calcium homeostasis and immune system imbalance in schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009;259:151-163.
  46. Li Y, Zhou KJ, Zhang Z, Sun LY, Yang JL, Zhang M, Ji BH, Tang KF, Wei ZY, He G, Gao LH, Yang L, Wang P, Yang P, Feng GY, He L, Wan CL: Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis reveals dysfunction of complement pathway in peripheral blood of schizophrenia patients: evidence for the immune hypothesis of schizophrenia. Mol Biosyst 2012;8:2664-2671.
  47. Herberth M, Rahmoune H, Schwarz E, Koethe D, Harris LW, Kranaster L, Witt SH, Spain M, Barnes A, Schmolz M, Leweke MF, Guest PC, Bahn S: Identification of a molecular profile associated with immune status in first-onset schizophrenia patients. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses 2014;7:207-215.
  48. Craddock RM, Huang JT, Jackson E, Harris N, Torrey EF, Herberth M, Bahn S: Increased α-defensins as a blood marker for schizophrenia susceptibility. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008;7:1204-1213.
  49. Bisgaard CF, Bak S, Christensen T, Jensen ON, Enghild JJ, Wiborg O: Vesicular signalling and immune modulation as hedonic fingerprints: proteomic profiling in the chronic mild stress depression model. J Psychopharmacol 2012;26:1569-1583.
  50. Olsen JV, Mann M: Status of large-scale analysis of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2013;12:3444-3452.
  51. Martins-de-Souza D, Guest PC, Vanattou-Saifoudine N, Rahmoune H, Bahn S: Phosphoproteomic differences in major depressive disorder postmortem brains indicate effects on synaptic function. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012;262:657-666.
  52. Karaki S, Becamel C, Murat S, Mannoury la Cour C, Millan MJ, Prézeau L, Bockaert J, Marin P, Vandermoere F: Quantitative phosphoproteomics unravels biased phosphorylation of serotonin 2A receptor at Ser280 by hallucinogenic versus nonhallucinogenic agonists. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014;13:1273-1285.
  53. Barabási AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J: Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:56-68.
  54. Qureshi IA, Mehler MF: Towards a ‘systems'-level understanding of the nervous system and its disorders. Trends Neurosci 2013;36:674-684.
  55. Turck CW, Iris F: Proteome-based pathway modelling of psychiatric disorders. Pharmacopsychiatry 2011;44:S54-S61.
  56. Gross CT, Canteras NS: The many paths to fear. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012;13:651-658.
  57. Filiou MD, Soukupova M, Rewerts C, Webhofer C, Turck CW, Maccarrone G: Variability assessment of 15N metabolic labeling-based proteomics workflow in mouse plasma and brain. Mol Biosyst 2015, Epub ahead of print.
  58. Russell MR, Lilley KS: Pipeline to assess the greatest source of technical variance in quantitative proteomics using metabolic labelling. J Proteomics 2012;77:441-454.
  59. Masson P, Spagou K, Nicholson JK, Want EJ: Technical and biological variation in UPLC-MS-based untargeted metabolic profiling of liver extracts: application in an experimental toxicity study on galactosamine. Anal Chem 2011;83:1116-1123.
  60. Choe LH, Lee KH: Quantitative and qualitative measure of intralaboratory two-dimensional protein gel reproducibility and the effects of sample preparation, sample load, and image analysis. Electrophoresis 2003;24:3500-3507.
  61. Pallen C: Technical variability of 2D gel electrophoresis - application to soybean allergens. Toxicol Rep 2014;1:734-742.
    External Resources
  62. Stoop MP, Coulier L, Rosenling T, Shi S, Smolinska AM, Buydens L, Ampt K, Stingl C, Dane A, Muilwijk B, Luitwieler RL, Sillevis Smitt PA, Hintzen RQ, Bischoff R, Wijmenga SS, Hankemeier T, van Gool AJ, Luider TM: Quantitative proteomics and metabolomics analysis of normal human cerebrospinal fluid samples. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010;9:2063-2075.
  63. Hyman SE: Revolution stalled. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:155cm11.
  64. He Y, Yu Z, Giegling I, Xie L, Hartmann AM, Prehn C, Adamski J, Kahn R, Li Y, Illig T, Wang-Sattler R, Rujescu D: Schizophrenia shows a unique metabolomics signature in plasma. Transl Psychiatry 2012;2:e149.
  65. Paige L, Mitchell MW, Krishnan RR, Kaddurah-Daouk R, Steffens DC: A preliminary metabolomic analysis of older adults with and without depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006;31:S107-S108.
  66. Ding XH, Yang SG, Li WJ, Liu Y, Li ZG, Zhang Y, Li LJ, Liu SJ: The potential biomarker panels for identification of major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with and without early life stress (ELS) by metabonomic analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e97479.
  67. Xuan J, Pan G, Qiu Y, Yang L, Su M, Liu Y, Chen J, Feng G, Fang Y, Jia W, Xing Q, He L: Metabolomic profiling to identify potential serum biomarkers for schizophrenia and risperidone action. J Proteome Res 2011;10:5433-5443.
  68. Orešič M, Tang J, Seppänen-Laakso T, Mattila I, Saarni SE, Saarni SI, Lönnqvist J, Sysi-Aho M, Hyötyläinen T, Perälä J, Suvisaari J: Metabolome in schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: a general population-based study. Genome Med 2011;3:19.
  69. Herberth M, Koethe D, Levin Y, Schwarz E, Krzyszton ND, Schoeffmann S, Ruh H, Rahmoune H, Kranaster L, Schoenborn T, Leweke MF, Guest PC, Bahn S: Peripheral profiling analysis for bipolar disorder reveals markers associated with reduced cell survival. Proteomics 2011;11:94-105.
  70. Schwarz E, Guest PC, Rahmoune H, Martins-de-Souza D, Niebuhr DW, Weber NS, Cowan DN, Yolken RH, Spain M, Barnes A, Bahn S: Identification of a blood-based biological signature in subjects with psychiatric disorders prior to clinical manifestation. World J Biol Psychiatry 2012;13:627-632.
  71. Wang L, Lockstone HE, Guest PC, Levin Y, Palotás A, Pietsch S, Schwarz E, Rahmoune H, Harris LW, Ma D, Bahn S: Expression profiling of fibroblasts identifies cell cycle abnormalities in schizophrenia. J Proteome Res 2010;9:521-527.
  72. Huang JT, Wang L, Prabakaran S, Wengenroth M, Lockstone HE, Koethe D, Gerth CW, Gross S, Schreiber D, Lilley K, Wayland M, Oxley D, Leweke FM, Bahn S: Independent protein-profiling studies show a decrease in apolipoprotein A1 levels in schizophrenia CSF, brain and peripheral tissues. Mol Psychiatry 2008;13:1118-1128.
  73. Cosgrove VE, Suppes T: Informing DSM-5: biological boundaries between bipolar I disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia. BMC Med 2013;11:127.
  74. Reckow S, Webhofer C: Analysis of individual protein turnover in live animals on a proteome-wide scale. Methods Mol Biol 2014;1156:147-154.
  75. Hsieh EJ, Shulman NJ, Dai DF, Vincow ES, Karunadharma PP, Pallanck L, Rabinovitch PS, Maccoss MJ: Topograph, a software platform for precursor enrichment corrected global protein turnover measurements. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012;11:1468-1474.
  76. Korth C: Aggregated proteins in schizophrenia and other chronic mental diseases: DISC1opathies. Prion 2012;6:134-141.
  77. Rubio MD, Wood K, Haroutunian V, Meador-Woodruff JH: Dysfunction of the ubiquitin proteasome and ubiquitin-like systems in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38:1910-1920.
  78. Rubakhin SS, Hatcher NG, Monroe EB, Heien ML, Sweedler JV: Mass spectrometric imaging of the nervous system. Curr Pharm Design 2007;13:3325-3334.
  79. Steinhauser ML, Bailey AP, Senyo SE, Guillermier C, Perlstein TS, Gould AP, Lee RT, Lechene CP: Multi-isotope imaging mass spectrometry quantifies stem cell division and metabolism. Nature 2012;481:516-519.
TOP