Mechanical properties of expanded skin tissue are different from normal skin, which is dependent mainly on the structural and functional integrity of dermal collagen fibrils. In the present study, mechanical properties and surface topography of both expanded and nonexpanded skin collagen fibrils were evaluated. Anisotropic controlled rate self-inflating tissue expanders were placed beneath the skin of sheep's forelimbs. The tissue expanders gradually increased in height and reached equilibrium in 2 weeks. They were left in situ for another 2 weeks before explantation. Expanded and normal skin samples were surgically harvested from the sheep (n = 5). Young's modulus and surface topography of collagen fibrils were measured using an atomic force microscope. A surface topographic scan showed organized hierarchical structural levels: collagen molecules, fibrils and fibers. No significant difference was detected for the D-banding pattern: 63.5 ± 2.6 nm (normal skin) and 63.7 ± 2.7 nm (expanded skin). Fibrils from expanded tissues consisted of loosely packed collagen fibrils and the width of the fibrils was significantly narrower compared to those from normal skin: 153.9 ± 25.3 and 106.7 ± 28.5 nm, respectively. Young's modulus of the collagen fibrils in the expanded and normal skin was not statistically significant: 46.5 ± 19.4 and 35.2 ± 27.0 MPa, respectively. In conclusion, the anisotropic controlled rate self-inflating tissue expander produced a loosely packed collagen network and the fibrils exhibited similar D-banding characteristics as the control group in a sheep model. However, the fibrils from the expanded skin were significantly narrower. The stiffness of the fibrils from the expanded skin was higher but it was not statistically different.

1.
Marcus J, Horan DB, Robinson JK: Tissue expansion: past, present, and future. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990;23:813-825.
2.
Swan MC, Bucknall DG, Goodacre TEE, Czernuszka JT: Synthesis and properties of a novel anisotropic self-inflating hydrogel tissue expander. Acta Biomater 2011;7:1126-1132.
3.
Swan MC, Bucknall DG, Czernuszka JT, Pigott DW, Goodacre TEE: Development of a novel anisotropic self-inflating tissue expander: in vivo submucoperiosteal performance in the porcine hard palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:79-88.
4.
Obdeijn MC, Nicolai J-PA, Werker P: The osmotic tissue expander: a three-year clinical experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:1219-1222.
5.
Chummun S, Addison P, Stewart KJ: The osmotic tissue expander: a 5-year experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:2128-2132.
6.
Kobus KF: Cleft palate repair with the use of osmotic expanders: a preliminary report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:414-421.
7.
Ottani V, Raspanti M, Ruggeri A: Collagen structure and functional implications. Micron 2001;32:251-260.
8.
Kennedy CJ, Wess TJ: The structure of collagen within parchment - a review. Restaurator Int J Preserv Libr Arch Mater 2003;24:61-80.
9.
Hulmes DJ, Wess TJ, Prockop DJ, Fratzl P: Radial packing, order, and disorder in collagen fibrils. Biophys J 1995;68:1661-1670.
10.
Hodge AJ, Petruska JA: Recent studies with the electron microscope on ordered aggregates of the tropocollagen molecule; in Ramachandran GN (ed): Aspects of Protein Structure. New York, Academic Press, 1963, pp 289-300.
11.
Cameron GJ, Alberts IL, Laing JH, Wess TJ: Structure of type I and type III heterotypic collagen fibrils: an X-ray diffraction study. J Struct Biol 2002;137:15-22.
12.
Puxkandl R, Zizak I, Paris O, Keckes J, Tesch W, Bernstorff S, et al: Viscoelastic properties of collagen: synchrotron radiation investigations and structural model. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002;357:191-197.
13.
Gutsmann T, Fantner GE, Venturoni M, Ekani-Nkodo A, Thompson JB, Kindt JH, et al: Evidence that collagen fibrils in tendons are inhomogeneously structured in a tubelike manner. Biophys J 2003;84:2593-2598.
14.
Eppell SJ, Smith BN, Kahn H, Ballarini R: Nano measurements with micro-devices: mechanical properties of hydrated collagen fibrils. J R Soc Interface 2006;3:117-121.
15.
Strasser S, Zink A, Janko M, Heckl WM, Thalhammer S: Structural investigations on native collagen type I fibrils using AFM. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007;354:27-32.
16.
Mosler E, Folkhard W, Knörzer E, Nemetschek-Gansler H, Nemetschek T, Koch MHJ: Stress-induced molecular rearrangement in tendon collagen. J Mol Biol 1985;182:589-596.
17.
Fratzl P, Misof K, Zizak I, Rapp G, Amenitsch H, Bernstorff S: Fibrillar structure and mechanical properties of collagen. J Struct Biol 1998;122:119-122.
18.
Wilkinson SJ, Hukins DWL: Determination of collagen fibril structure and orientation in connective tissues by X-ray diffraction. Radiat Phys Chem 1999;56:197-204.
19.
Cox G, Kable E, Jones A, Fraser I, Manconi F, Gorrell MD: 3-Dimensional imaging of collagen using second harmonic generation. J Struct Biol 2003;141:53-62.
20.
Cox G, Kable E: Second-harmonic imaging of collagen; in Taatjes DJ, Mossman BT (eds): Methods in Molecular Biology. New Jersey, Humana Press, 2006, vol 319, pp 15-35.
21.
Graham HK, Hodson NW, Hoyland JA, Millward-Sadler SJ, Garrod D, Scothern A, et al: Tissue section AFM: In situ ultrastructural imaging of native biomolecules. Matrix Biol 2010;29:254-260.
22.
Andriotis OG, Manuyakorn W, Zekonyte J, Katsamenis OL, Fabri S, Howarth PH, et al: Nanomechanical assessment of human and murine collagen fibrils via atomic force microscopy cantilever-based nanoindentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;39:9-26.
23.
Tang B, Fong MK, Wen CY, Yan CH, Chan D, Ngan AHW, et al: Nanostiffness of collagen fibrils extracted from osteoarthritic cartilage characterized with AFM nanoindentation. Soft Mater 2014;12:253-261.
24.
Faingold A, Cohen SR, Shahar R, Weiner S, Rapoport L, Wagner HD: The effect of hydration on mechanical anisotropy, topography and fibril organization of the osteonal lamellae. J Biomech 2014;47:367-372.
25.
Bhushan B: Nanotribological and nanomechanical properties of skin with and without cream treatment using atomic force microscopy and nanoindentation. J Colloid Interface Sci 2012;367:1-33.
26.
Chen S, Bhushan B: Nanomechanical and nanotribological characterization of two synthetic skins with and without skin cream treatment using atomic force microscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci 2013;398:247-254.
27.
Graham JS, Vomund AN, Phillips CL, Grandbois M: Structural changes in human type I collagen fibrils investigated by force spectroscopy. Exp Cell Res 2004;299:335-342.
28.
Janko M, Zink A, Gigler AM, Heckl WM, Stark RW: Nanostructure and mechanics of mummified type I collagen from the 5,300-year-old Tyrolean Iceman. Proc Biol Sci 2010;277:2301-2309.
29.
Shen ZL, Kahn H, Ballarini R, Eppell SJ: Viscoelastic properties of isolated collagen fibrils. Biophys J 2011;100:3008-3015.
30.
Wenger MPE, Bozec L, Horton MA, Mesquida P: Mechanical properties of collagen fibrils. Biophys J 2007;93:1255-1263.
31.
Leite FL, Mattoso LHC, Oliveira ON Jr, Herrmann PSP Jr: The atomic force spectroscopy as a tool to investigate surface forces: basic principles and applications; in Méndez-Vilas A, Díaz J (eds): Modern Research and Educational Topics in Microscopy. Badajoz, Formatex, 2007, pp 747-757.
32.
Carruthers CA, Dearth CL, Reing JE, Kramer CR, Gagne DH, Crapo PM, et al: Histologic characterization of acellular dermal matrices in a porcine model of tissue expander breast reconstruction. Tissue Eng Part A 2014;21:35-44.
33.
Liu X-Y, Li H-T, Li L, Chen L, Wang L-J, Ma K, et al: Chronic urogenital sinus expansion in reconstruction of high persistent cloaca. Pediatr Surg Int 2012;28:835-840.
34.
Sheng L, Yu Q, Xie F, Li Q: Foreign body response induced by tissue expander implantation. Mol Med Rep 2014;9:872-876.
35.
Toutain CE, Brouchet L, Raymond-Letron I, Vicendo P, Bergès H, Favre J, et al: Prevention of skin flap necrosis by estradiol involves reperfusion of a protected vascular network. Circ Res 2009;104:245-254.
36.
Schneider MS, Borkow JE, Cruz IT, Marangoni RD, Shaffer J, Grove D: The tensiometric properties of expanded guinea pig skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:398-403.
37.
Timmenga EJF, Schoorl R, Klopper PJ: Biomechanical and histomorphological changes in expanded rabbit skin. Br J Plast Surg 1990;43:101-106.
38.
Zeng Y-J, Liu Y-H, Xu C-Q, Xu X-H, Xu H, Sun G-C: Biomechanical properties of skin in vitro for different expansion methods. Clin Biomech 2004;19:853-857.
39.
Zhang E-P, Liao D-H, Liu A-Z, Wang X-B, Li X-Y, Zeng Y-J, et al: Biomechanical characteristics investigation on long-term free graft with expanded porcine skin. Clin Biomech 2006;21:864-869.
40.
Pamplona DC, Velloso RQ, Radwanski HN: On skin expansion. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;29:655-662.
41.
Svensson RB, Hansen P, Hassenkam T, Haraldsson BT, Aagaard P, Kovanen V, et al: Mechanical properties of human patellar tendon at the hierarchical levels of tendon and fibril. J Appl Physiol 2012;112:419-426.
42.
Bascom DA, Wax MK: Tissue expansion in the head and neck: current state of the art. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;10:273-277.
43.
Squier CA: The stretching of mouse skin in vivo: effect on epidermal proliferation and thickness. J Invest Dermatol 1980;74:68-71.
44.
Austad ED, Pasyk KA, McClatchey KD, Cherry GW: Histomorphologic evaluation of guinea pig skin and soft tissue after controlled tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;70:704-710.
45.
Ersek RA, Vazquez-Salisbury A: Wound closure using a skin stretching device. Contemp Orthop 1994;28:495-500.
46.
Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Mancoll JS, Phillips LG: Creep versus stretch: a review of the viscoelastic properties of skin. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41:215-219.
47.
Monboisse JC, Poulin G, Braquet P, Randoux A, Ferradini C, Borel JP: Effect of oxy radicals on several types of collagen. Int J Tissue React 1984;6:385-390.
48.
Darvin ME, Richter H, Ahlberg S, Haag SF, Meinke MC, Le Quintrec D, et al: Influence of sun exposure on the cutaneous collagen/elastin fibers and carotenoids: negative effects can be reduced by application of sunscreen. J Biophotonics 2014;7:735-743.
49.
Hsu A, Mustoe TA: The principles of wound healing; in Weinzweig J (ed): Plastic Surgery Secret Plus, ed 2. Philadelphia, Mosby Elsevier, 2010.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.