Background: The main reason for morbidity after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). The mainstay of medical therapy for treating DCI is induced hypertension with vasopressors to restore cerebral perfusion. Both phenylephrine (PE) and norepinephrine (NE) are commonly used for induced hypertension, but the impact of the initial choice of vasopressor on the efficacy, adverse effects, or outcome after hemodynamic therapy for DCI is unknown. Methods: Sixty-three patients with aSAH between January 2012 and October 2014, who developed DCI (defined as new focal deficit or decline in Glasgow Coma Score) and in which PE (n = 45) or NE (n = 18) treatment was initiated were evaluated in this retrospective study. Baseline characteristics, adverse effects, the need to change or add vasopressors, the response to therapy, the need for endovascular therapy, new infarct development, discharge disposition, and 3 months modified Rankin score were all compared between pressor groups. Results: Baseline characteristics (e.g., Hunt Hess and Fisher grades) were similar. There were no differences in the overall rate of complications including arrhythmia, pulmonary edema, or kidney injury. However, those initiated on PE were more likely to be changed to an alternate vasopressor (64 vs. 33%, p = 0.016), mostly for bradycardia or failure to reach therapeutic targets. Patients initially treated with PE were less likely to respond neurologically (71 vs. 94%, p = 0.01) or to be discharged to home or acute rehabilitation facilities (73 vs. 94%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to have a delayed infarct on imaging (62 vs. 33%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Our study suggests that patients with DCI after aSAH initiated on PE are more likely to require treatment change to another vasopressor and are at greater risk for poor clinical outcomes compared to patients started on NE. Larger comparative studies are warranted.

1.
Al-Tamimi YZ, Orsi NM, Quinn AC, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Ross SA: A review of delayed ischemic neurologic deficit following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: historical overview, current treatment, and pathophysiology. World Neurosurg 2010;73:654-667.
2.
Vergouwen MD, Ilodigwe D, Macdonald RL: Cerebral infarction after subarachnoid hemorrhage contributes to poor outcome by vasospasm-dependent and -independent effects. Stroke 2011;42:924-929.
3.
Diringer MN, Bleck TP, Claude Hemphill J 3rd, Menon D, Shutter L, Vespa P, et al: Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society's multidisciplinary consensus conference. Neurocrit Care 2011;15:211-240.
4.
Steiner T, Juvela S, Unterberg A, Jung C, Forsting M, Rinkel G: European Stroke Organization Guidelines for the management of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;35:93-112.
5.
Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, Derdeyn CP, Dion J, Higashida RT, et al: Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2012;43:1711-1737.
6.
Kosnik EJ, Hunt WE: Postoperative hypertension in the management of patients with intracranial arterial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1976;45:148-154.
7.
Miller JA, Dacey RG Jr, Diringer MN: Safety of hypertensive hypervolemic therapy with phenylephrine in the treatment of delayed ischemic deficits after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1995;26:2260-2266.
8.
Muizelaar JP, Becker DP: Induced hypertension for the treatment of cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Direct effect on cerebral blood flow. Surg Neurol 1986;25:317-325.
9.
Meyer R, Deem S, Yanez ND, Souter M, Lam A, Treggiari MM: Current practices of triple-H prophylaxis and therapy in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2011;14:24-36.
10.
Stewart A, Fernando R, McDonald S, Hignett R, Jones T, Columb M: The dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2010;111:1230-1237.
11.
Landzberg JS, Parker JD, Gauthier DF, Colucci WS: Effects of myocardial alpha 1-adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade on contractility in humans. Circulation 1991;84:1608-1614.
12.
Brooker RF, Butterworth JF 4th, Kitzman DW, Berman JM, Kashtan HI, McKinley AC: Treatment of hypotension after hyperbaric tetracaine spinal anesthesia. A randomized, double-blind, cross-over comparison of phenylephrine and epinephrine. Anesthesiology 1997;86:797-805.
13.
Sharrock NE, Go G, Mineo R, Harpel PC: The hemodynamic and fibrinolytic response to low dose epinephrine and phenylephrine infusions during total hip replacement under epidural anesthesia. Thromb Haemost 1992;68:436-441.
14.
Ngan Kee WD, Lee SW, Ng FF, Tan PE, Khaw KS: Randomized double-blinded comparison of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for maintenance of blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2015;122:736-745.
15.
Overgaard CB, Dzavík V: Inotropes and vasopressors: review of physiology and clinical use in cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2008;118:1047-1056.
16.
Vergouwen MD, Vermeulen M, van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ, Wijdicks EF, Muizelaar JP, et al: Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Stroke 2010;41:2391-2395.
17.
Kassell NF, Peerless SJ, Durward QJ, Beck DW, Drake CG, Adams HP: Treatment of ischemic deficits from vasospasm with intravascular volume expansion and induced arterial hypertension. Neurosurgery 1982;11:337-343.
18.
Brown FD, Hanlon K, Mullan S: Treatment of aneurysmal hemiplegia with dopamine and mannitol. J Neurosurg 1978;49:525-529.
19.
Ducrocq N, Kimmoun A, Furmaniuk A, Hekalo Z, Maskali F, Poussier S, et al: Comparison of equipressor doses of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and phenylephrine on septic myocardial dysfunction. Anesthesiology 2012;116:1083-1091.
20.
Tranmer BI, Keller TS, Kindt GW, Archer D: Loss of cerebral regulation during cardiac output variations in focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurosurg 1992;77:253-259.
21.
Joseph M, Ziadi S, Nates J, Dannenbaum M, Malkoff M: Increases in cardiac output can reverse flow deficits from vasospasm independent of blood pressure: a study using xenon computed tomographic measurement of cerebral blood flow. Neurosurgery 2003;53:1044-1051; discussion 1051-1052.
22.
Choi JW, Joo Ahn H, Yang M, Kim JA, Lee SM, Ahn JH: Comparison between phenylephrine and dopamine in maintaining cerebral oxygen saturation in thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e2212.
23.
Kilbourn KJ, Ching G, Silverman DI, McCullough L, Brown RJ: Clinical outcomes after neurogenic stress induced cardiomyopathy in aneurysmal sub-arachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015;128:4-9.
24.
Yokobori S, Watanabe A, Igarashi Y, Tagami T, Kuwamoto K, Ishinokami S, et al: The serum level of brain natriuretic peptide increases in severe subarachnoid hemorrhage thereby reflecting an increase in both cardiac preload and afterload. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:276-283.
25.
Moussouttas M, Mearns E, Walters A, DeCaro M: Plasma catecholamine profile of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with neurogenic cardiomyopathy. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2015;5:57-67.
26.
Brown RJ, Kumar A, Dhar R, Sampson TR, Diringer MN: The relationship between delayed infarcts and angiographic vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2013;72:702-707; discussion 707-708.
27.
Woitzik J, Dreier JP, Hecht N, Fiss I, Sandow N, Major S, et al: Delayed cerebral ischemia and spreading depolarization in absence of angiographic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2012;32:203-212.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.