Background/Aims: It has been shown that nitric oxide (NO) generated from neuronal NO synthase (nNOS) counteracts angiotensin II mediated vasoconstriction in the pre- and in the postglomerular microcirculation. Previous studies have demonstrated that the nNOS expression in the macula densa of the renal cortex is enhanced by dietary salt restriction. In view of the well-known fact that dietary salt restriction also leads to an activation of the renin-angiotensin system, the present study was performed to assess the role of nNOS-derived NO in the regulation of the renal function in rats maintained on control (C) and low-salt (LS) diets. Methods: Groups of rats were fed either the C or the LS diet. On day 13 after adaptation to the appropriate diet, renal clearance studies were performed to determine the effects of acute nNOS inhibition either by S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline (L-SMTC) or by Nω-propyl-L-arginine (L-NPA) on renal hemodynamics and sodium excretory function. In separate groups of rats maintained on either the C or the LS diet, the mRNA levels of nNOS and of renin in the renal cortex were examined using the semiquantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Results: Intrarenal infusion of vehicle (0.9% saline; 4 µl/min) did not change glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renal plasma flow (RPF), or sodium excretion in either C diet or LS diet rats. Acute intrarenal infusion of L-SMTC (0.3 mg/h) and L-NPA (0.01 mg/h) decreased GFR (–14 ± 5 vs. –13 ± 3%), RPF (–19 ± 6 vs. –17 ± 5%), and sodium excretion (–17 ± 5 vs. –16 ± 4%) in C diet rats as compared with control values (p < 0.05). In contrast, in LS rats, intrarenal administration of either L-SMTC or L-NPA did not cause significant changes in GFR, RPF, and sodium excretion. Furthermore, the mRNA expression for nNOS in the renal cortex was moderately increased in LS rats as compared with C rats (densitometric ratios of nNOS mRNA/GAPDH mRNA 0.31 ± 0.01 vs. 0.22 ± 0.04, p < 0.05), in parallel with the renin expression (renin mRNA/GAPDH mRNA ratios 1.4 ± 0.2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.1, p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results indicate that in normotensive rats kept on a normal salt intake nNOS-derived NO modulates both afferent and efferent arteriolar tones. In contrast, rats on an LS diet exhibit an impaired renal vascular responsiveness to nNOS-derived NO or an impaired ability to release NO by nNOS despite enhanced expression of nNOS mRNA in the renal cortex. In addition, the lack of effect of acute nNOS inhibition on renal function suggests that NO derived by nNOS does not participate in counteracting the vasoconstrictor influences of elevated circulating and/or intrarenal angiotensin II levels on pre- and postglomerular microcirculation in rats on an LS diet.

Keywords:
Sodium restriction, Nitric oxide, Neuronal nitric oxide synthase, S-methyl-L-thiocitrulline, Glomerular filtration rate, Renal plasma flow, Nω-propyl-L-arginine
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.