Background: Asthma attacks and mortality due to inhalation of soybean antigens in Barcelona have been well documented. Strict protective measures in the unloading process were established in 1998 to avoid the release of soybean dust into the atmosphere. The present study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of these latest environmental measures, and, if effective, to recommend their implementation in the many harbours where soybean is unloaded. Methods: Levels of soybean aeroallergen were analysed daily during a period of 5 years and 2 months in a total of 1,854 samples, 125 from the pre-intervention period and 1,729 from the postintervention period. Additionally, the number of asthma admissions to the emergency rooms of the city’s three largest hospitals was recorded. Asthma patients attended at home by the public home emergency service and judicial autopsies registering asthma deaths were also investigated. Results: The mean concentration of soybean aeroallergen was 159 U/m3 in the pre-intervention period and 39 U/m3 in the postintervention period (p < 0.0001). Significant differences in postintervention aeroallergen concentrations were found between days of soybean unloading (42 U/m3) and days of no unloading (33 U/m3), with p < 0.0001. No significant relationship was found between concentrations of environmental soybean aeroallergens and the number of emergency room admissions for asthma. Conclusions: Implementation of stricter protective measures in silos for the soybean unloading process has reduced the concentration of soybean dust in the atmosphere and evidences the effectiveness of the measures adopted.

Keywords:
ELISA-inhibition, Soybean, Aeroallergen
1.
Antó JM, Sunyer J, Rodriguez-Roisin, et al: Asthma epidemics associated with soybean dust relevant during harbour activities. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1097–1102.
2.
Rodrigo MJ, Morell F, Helm RM, et al: Identification and partial characterization of the soybean-dust allergens involved in the Barcelona asthma epidemic. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1990;85:778–784.
3.
Sunyer J, Antó JM, Rodrigo MJ, et al: Case-control study of serum immunoglobulin-E antibodies reactive with soybean in epidemic asthma. Lancet 1989;1:179–182.
4.
Antó JM, Sunyer J, Reed CE, et al: Preventing asthma epidemics due to soybean by dust-control measures. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1760–1763.
5.
Manzanera R, Armengol R, Villalbí JR, et al: Public Health and Soybean-Related Asthma in Barcelona. Barcelona, Ajuntament de Barcelona, 1999.
6.
Soriano JB, Antó JM, Plasència A, et al: Repeaters count: A sentinel method for asthma outbreaks. Thorax 1995;50:1101–1103.
7.
Albert R: A propos de douze cas de sensibilisation au groupe des légumineuses comestibles. Rev Fr Allergol 1973;13:399–410.
8.
White MC, Etzel RA, Olson DR, et al: Re-examination of epidemic asthma in New Orleans, Louisiana, in relation to the presence of soy at the harbour. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:1–7.
9.
Cocco G, Schiano M, Sacerdoti G: Functional characteristics in soybean asthma (abstract). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:469.
10.
Navarro C, Marquez M, Hernando L, et al: Epidemic asthma in Cartagena, Spain, and its association with soybean sensitivity. Epidemiology 1993;4:76–79.
11.
Garcia-Ortega P, Rovira E, Mora E: Epidemias de asma alérgica a semilla de soja en ciudades pequeñas. Med Clin (Barc) 1997;108:677.
12.
Ballester F, Soriano JB, Otero I, et al: Asthma visits to emergency rooms and soybean unloading in the harbours of Valencia and A Coruña, Spain. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:315–322.
13.
Aceves M, Grimalt JO, Sunyer J, et al: Identification of soybean dust as an epidemic asthma agent in urban areas by molecular marker and RAST analysis of aerosols. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;88:124–134.
14.
Cruz MJ, Rodrigo MJ, Antó JM, et al: An amplified ELISA inhibition method for the measurement of airborne soybean allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000;122:42–48.
15.
Swanson MC, Li J, Wentz-Murtha PE, Trudeau WL, et al: Source of the aeroallergen of soybean dust: A low molecular mass from the soybean tela. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1991;87:783–788.
16.
Global Initiative for Asthma: Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention NHLBI/WHO Workshop Report. NIH Publ No 96–3659B. Bethesda, Md., National Institute of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 1998.
17.
Morell F, Codina R, Rodrigo MJ, et al: Diagnosis of soybean-induced asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995;96:320–324.
18.
Box GE, Jenkins GM: Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco, Holden-Day, 1976.
19.
Diggle P: Time Series: A Biostatistical Introduction. New York, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press, 1992.
20.
Chatfield C: The Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction, ed 5. London, Chapman & Hall, 1996.
21.
Murillo C: Métodos estadísticos de series temporales. Aplicaciones sanitarias. Barcelona, SG Editores SA, 1994.
22.
Schnell D, Zaidi A, Reynolds G: A time series analysis of gonorrhea surveillance data. Stat Med 1989;8:343–352.
23.
Helfenstein U, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Braun-Fahrlander C, et al: The environmental accident at ‘Schweizerhalle’ and respiratory diseases in children: A time series analysis. Stat Med 1991;10:1481–1492.
24.
Fernandez-Perez C, Tejada J, Carrasco M: Multivariate time series analysis in nosocomial infection surveillance system: A case study. Int J Epidemiol 1998;27:282–288.
25.
Antó JM, Soriano JB, Sunyer J, et al: Soybean sensitization in epidemic asthma patients 8 years after an intervention. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:A515.
26.
Platts-Mills TAE, de Weck AL (chairmen): Dust mite allergens and asthma: A worldwide problem. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:416–427.
27.
Platts-Mills TAE, Thomas WR, Aalberse RC, et al: Dust mite allergens and asthma: Report of a 2nd international workshop. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992;89:1046–1060.
28.
Hollander A, Gordon S, Renström A, et al: Comparison of methods to assess airborne rat and mouse allergen levels. I. Analysis of air samples. Allergy 1999;54:142–149.
29.
Renström A, Gordon S, Hollander A, et al: Comparison of methods to assess airborne rat and mouse allergen levels. II. Factors influencing antigen detection. Allergy 1999;54:150–157.
30.
Anto JM, Murillo C: Aplicaciones sanitarias del análisis de series temporales (editorial). Gac Sanit 1991;22:3–4.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.