Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Cytogenet Genome Res 2009;124:339–350

Role of Fluorescence in situ Hybridization in Sequencing the Tomato Genome

Stack S.M.a, b · Royer S.M.a · Shearer L.A.a · Chang S.B.d · Giovannoni J.J.c · Westfall D.H.a · White R.A.c · Anderson L.K.a, b

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Biology and bProgram in Molecular Plant Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo.; cUSDA-ARS Robert Holley Center and Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., USA; dDepartment of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Corresponding Author

Stephen M. Stack

Department of Biology, Colorado State University

Fort Collins, CO 80523-1878 (USA)

Tel. +1 970 491 6802, Fax +1 970 491 0649

E-Mail sstack@lamar.colostate.edu

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genome is being sequenced by a consortium of laboratories in 10 countries. Seventy-seven percent of the tomato genome (DNA) is located in repeat-rich, gene-poor, pericentric heterochromatin, while 23% of the genome is located in repeat-poor, gene-rich, distal euchromatin. It is estimated that approximately 90% of tomato’s nuclear genes can be characterized by limiting the sequencing effort to euchromatin while avoiding the problems involved in sequencing the repetitive DNA in heterochromatin. Sequencing is being performed on tomato nuclear DNA cloned into bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) vectors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is used to help direct the sequencing effort by cytologically demonstrating the location of selected BACs on tomato chromosomes. While mitotic metaphase chromosomes are too short and compact for this purpose, long pachytene chromosomes are ideal. BACs localized in euchromatin can be used confidently as anchors for the assembly of BAC contigs that extend through the euchromatic length of each chromosome arm. Another important role for FISH is identification of BACs near telomeres and near borders with pericentric heterochromatin to indicate that sequencing should not extend much further. This role of FISH is enhanced by our ability to estimate base pair distances between localized BACs and these chromosomal features. Finally, it is noteworthy that when BAC-FISH is combined with chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization to block repeats and localize single/low copy sequences, the great majority of BACs localize to single sites. This observation is consistent with tomato being an ancient diploid.

© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel


  1. Arumuganathan K, Earle ED: Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Reptr 9:208–218 (1991).
  2. Bennett MD, Smith JB: Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 274:227–274 (1976).
  3. Bennett MD, Smith JB: Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 334:309–345 (1991).
  4. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ, Price HJ, Johnston JS: Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (∼100 Mb) and Drosophila (∼175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be ∼157 Mb and thus ∼25% larger than the Arabidopsis genome initiative estimate of ∼125 Mb. Ann Bot 91:1–11 (2003).
  5. Blanc G, Wolfe KH: Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16:1667–1678 (2004).
  6. Budiman MA, Mao L, Wood TC, Wing RA: A deep-coverage tomato BAC library and prospects toward development of an STC framework for genome sequencing. Genome Res 10:129–136 (2000).
  7. Chang SB: Cytogenetic and Molecular Studies on Tomato Chromosomes using Diploid Tomato and Tomato Monosomic Additions in Tetraploid Potato, pp 1–125 (Wageningen University, Wageningen 2004).
  8. Chang SB, Anderson LK, Sherman JD, Royer SM, Stack SM: Predicting and testing physical locations of genetically mapped loci on tomato pachytene chromosome 1. Genetics 176:2131–2138 (2007).
  9. Cheng Z, Buell CR, Wing RA, Gu M, Jiang J: Toward a cytological characterization of the rice genome. Genome Res 11:2133–2141 (2001).
  10. Cheng Z, Buell CR, Wing RA, Jiang J: Resolution of fluorescence in-situ hybridization mapping on rice mitotic prometaphase chromosomes, meiotic pachytene chromosomes and extended DNA fibers. Chromosome Res 10:379–387 (2002).
  11. de Jong JH, Fransz PF, Zabel P: High resolution FISH in plants – techniques and applications. Trends Plant Sci 4:258–263 (1999).
  12. Emrich SJ, Li L, Wen TJ, Yandeau-Nelson MD, Fu Y, et al: Nearly identical paralogs: Implications for maize (Zea mays L.) genome evolution. Genetics 175:429–439 (2007).
  13. Fransz P, Armstrong S, Alonso-Blanco C, Fischer TC, Torres-Ruiz RA, Jones G: Cytogenetics for the model system Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 13:867–876 (1998).
  14. Gaut BS, Doebley JF: DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:6809–6814 (1997).
  15. Guyot R, Keller B: Ancestral genome duplication in rice. Genome 47:610–614 (2004).
  16. Jun Y, Jun W, Wei L, Songgang L, Heng L, et al: The genomes of Oryza sativa: a history of duplications. PLoS Biol 3:1–16 (2005).
    External Resources
  17. Khush GS, Rick CM: Studies on the linkage map of chromosome 4 of the tomato and on the transmission of induced deficiencies. Genetica 38:74–94 (1967).
    External Resources
  18. Ku H-M, Vision TJ, Liu J, Tanksley SD: Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidosis genomes: Large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9121–9126 (2000).
  19. Kulikova O, Gualtieri G, Geurts R, Kim DJ, Cook D, et al: Integration of the FISH pachytene and genetic maps of Medicago truncatula. Plant J 27:49–58 (2001).
  20. Landegent JE, Jandsen in de Wal N, Dirks RW, Bass F, van der Ploeg M: Use of whole cosmid cloned genomic sequences for chromosomal localization by non-radioactive in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 77:366–370 (1987).
  21. Lapitan NLV, Ganal MW, Tanksley SD: Somatic chromosome karyotype of tomato based on in situ hybridization of the TGRI satellite repeat. Genome 32:992–998 (1989).
  22. Lawrence CJ, Seigfried TE, Bass HW, Anderson LK: Predicting chromosomal locations of genetically mapped loci in maize using the Morgan2McClintock translator. Genetics 172:2007–2009 (2006).
  23. Lichter P, Cremer T, Borden J, Manuelidis L, Ward DC: Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries. Hum Genet 80:224–234 (1988).
  24. Pagel J, Walling JG, Young ND, Shoemaker RC, Jackson SA: Segmental duplications within the Glycine max genome revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization of bacterial artificial chromosomes. Genome 47:764–768 (2004).
  25. Peterson DG, Price HJ, Johnston JS, Stack SM: DNA content of heterochromatin and euchromatin in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) pachytene chromosomes. Genome 39:77–82 (1996).
  26. Peterson DG, Boehm KS, Stack S: Isolation of milligram quantities of DNA from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), a plant containing high levels of polyphenolic compounds. Plant Mol Biol Reptr 15:148–153 (1997).
  27. Peterson DG, Pearson WR, Stack SM: Characterization of the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) genome using in vitro and in situ DNA reassociation. Genome 41:346–356 (1998).
  28. Peterson DG, Lapitan N, Stack SM: Localization of single- and low-copy sequences on tomato synaptonemal complex spreads using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Genetics 152:427–439 (1999).
  29. Ramanna MS, Prakken R: Structure of and homology between pachytene and somatic metaphase chromosomes of the tomato. Genetica (The Hague) 38:115–133 (1967).
  30. Ross KJ, Fransz PF, Jones GH: A light microscopic atlas of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chromosome Res 4:507–516 (1996).
  31. Schlueter JA, Dixon P, Granger C, Grant D, Clark L, et al: Mining EST databases to resolve evolutionary events in major crop species. Genome 47:868–876 (2004).
  32. Sherman JD, Stack SM: Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. V. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) karyotype and idiogram. Genome 35:354–359 (1992).
    External Resources
  33. Sherman JD, Stack SM: Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. VI. High-resolution recombination nodule map for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Genetics 141:683–708 (1995).
  34. Shoemaker RC, Polzin K, Labate J, Specht J, Brummer EC, et al: Genome duplication in soybean (Glycine subgenus soja). Genetics 144:329–338 (1996).
  35. Stack SM: Heterochromatin, the synaptonemal complex, and crossing over. J Cell Sci 71:159–176 (1984).
  36. Stack SM, Anderson LK: A model for chromosome structure during the mitotic and meiotic cell cycles. Chromosome Res 9:175–198 (2001).
  37. Stack SM, Anderson LK: Electron microscopic immunogold localization of recombination-related proteins in spreads of synaptonemal complexes from tomato microsporocytes, in Keeney S (ed): Meiosis (Humana Press, Totowa 2008).
  38. Szinay D, Chang SB, Khrustaleva L, Peters S, Schijlen E, et al: High-resolution chromosome mapping of BACs using multi-color FISH and pooled-BAC FISH as a backbone for sequencing tomato chromosome 6. Plant J 56:627–637 (2008).
  39. Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD: The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science 290:2114–2117 (2000).
  40. Wang Y, Tang X, Cheng Z, Mueller L, Giovannoni J, Tanksley SD: Euchromatin and pericentromeric heterochromatin: Comparative composition in the tomato genome. Genetics 172:2529–2540 (2006).
  41. Wendel JF: Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol Biol 42:225–249 (2000).
  42. Wu F, Mueller LA, Crouzillat D, Pétiard V, Tanksley SD: Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: A test case in the euasterid plant clade. Genetics 174:1407–1420 (2006).
  43. Xiao H, Jiang N, Schaffner E, Stockinger EJ, van der Knaap E: A retrotransposon-mediated gene duplication underlies morphological variation of tomato fruit. Science 319:1527–1530 (2008).
  44. Zhong X, Fransz PF, Wennekes-van Eden J, Zabel P, van Kammen A, de Jong JH: High-resolution mapping on pachytene chromosomes and extended DNA fibres by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Plant Mol Biol Rep 14:232–242 (1996).
  45. Zhong XB, Bodeau J, Fransz PF, Williamson VM, van Kammen A, et al: FISH to meiotic pachytene chromosomes of tomato locates the root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi-1 and the acid phosphatase gene Aps-1 near the junction of euchromatin and pericentromeric heterochromatin of chromosome arms 6S and 6L, respectively. Theor Appl Genet 98:365–370 (1999).
  46. Zwick MS, Hanson RE, McKnight TD, Islam-Faridi MN, Stelly DM, et al: A rapid procedure for the isolation of Cot-1 DNA from plants. Genome 40:138–142 (1997).

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Review Article

Accepted: August 04, 2008
Published online: June 25, 2009

Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 8
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR