Semi-automatic computer-assisted planimetry is often used for the quantification of restenosis parameters after balloon angioplasty although it is a time-consuming method. Moreover, slicing the artery to enable analysis of two-dimensional (2-D) images leads to a loss of information since the vessel structure is three-dimensional (3-D). Cavalieri’s principle uses systematic random sampling allowing 3-D quantification. This study compares the accuracy and efficiency of planimetry versus point-counting measurements on restenosis parameters after balloon angioplasty and investigates the use of Cavalieri’s principle for 3-D volume quantification. Bland and Altman plots showed good agreement between planimetry and point counting for the 2-D and 3-D quantification of lumen, internal elastic lamina (IEL) and external elastic lamina (EEL), with a slightly smaller agreement for intima and media. Mean values and induced coefficients of variation were similar for both methods for all parameters. Point counting induced a 6% error in its 3-D quantification, which is negligible in view of the biological variation (>90%) among animals. However, point counting was 3 times faster compared to planimetry, improving its efficiency. This study shows that combining Cavalieri’s principle with point counting is a precise and efficient method for the 3-D quantification of restenosis parameters after balloon angioplasty.

Keywords:
Cavalieri, Point counting, Planimetry, Restenosis, Stereology
1.
Califf RM, Fortin DF, Frid DJ, Harlan WR, Ohman EM, Bengtson JR, Nelson CL, Tcheng JE, Mark DB, Stack RS: Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: An overview. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:2B–13B.
2.
Christen T, Verin V, Bochaton-Piallat M-L, Popowski Y, Ramaekers F, Debruyne P, Camenzind E, van Eys G, Gabbiani G: Mechanisms of neointima formation and remodeling in the porcine coronary artery. Circulation 2001;103:882–888.
3.
Höfling B, Huehns TY: Restenosis after angioplasty – an update on relevant animal models. J Invasive Cardiol 1996;8:388–395.
4.
Faxon DP, Sanborn TA, Weber VJ, Haudenschild C, Gottsman SB, McGovern WA, Ryan TJ: Restenosis following transluminal angioplasty in experimental atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis 1984;4:189–195.
5.
Kakuta T, Currier JW, Haudenschild CC, Ryan TJ, Faxon DP: Differences in compensatory vessel enlargement, not intimal formation, account for restenosis after angioplasty in the hypercholesterolemic rabbit model. Circulation 1994;89:2809–2815.
6.
Lafont A, Guzman LA, Whitlow PL, Goormastic M, Cornhill JF, Chisolm GM: Restenosis after experimental angioplasty. Intimal, medial, and adventitial changes associated with constrictive remodeling. Circ Res 1995;76:996–1002.
7.
Wilensky RL, March KL, Gradus-Pizlo I, Sandusky G, Fineberg N, Hathaway DR: Vascular injury, repair, and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the atherosclerotic rabbit. Circulation 1995;92:2995–3005.
8.
Liu MW, Lin S-J, Chen Y-L: Local alcohol delivery may reduce phenotype conversion of smooth muscle cells and neointimal formation in rabbit iliac arteries after balloon injury. Atherosclerosis 1996;127:221–227.
9.
Schwarzacher SP, Lim TT, Wang B, Kernoff RS, Niebauer J, Cooke JP, Yeung AC: Local intramural delivery of L-arginine enhances nitric oxide generation and inhibits lesion formation after balloon angioplasty. Circulation 1997;95:1863–1869.
10.
Kimura T, Miyauchi K, Yamagami S, Daida H, Yamaguchi H: Local delivery infusion pressure is a key determinant of vascular damage and intimal thickening. Jpn Circ J 1998;62:299–304.
11.
Roberts N, Cruz-Orive LM, Reid NMK, Brodie DA, Bourne DA, Edwards RHT: Unbiased estimation of human body composition by the Cavalieri method using magnetic resonance imaging. J Microsc 1993;171:239–253.
12.
Mayhew TM: 3D structure from thin sections: Applications of stereology. Eur Microsc Anal 2000;4:17–20.
13.
Gundersen HJG, Jensen EB: The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc 1987;147:229–263.
14.
Mayhew TM, Olsen DR: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and model-free estimates of brain volume determined using the Cavalieri principle. J Anat 1991;178:133–144.
15.
Roberts N, Garden AS, Cruz-Orive LM, Whitehouse GH, Edwards RHT: Estimation of fetal volume by magnetic resonance imaging and stereology. Br J Radiol 1994;67:1067–1077.
16.
Roberts N, Cruz-Orive LM, Bourne M, Herfkens RJ, Karwoski RA, Whitehouse GH: Analysis of cardiac function by MRI and stereology. J Microsc 1997;187:31–42.
17.
Rosenfield K, Losordo DW, Ramaswamy K, Pastore JO, Langevin RE, Razvi S, Kosowsky BD, Isner JM: Three-dimensional reconstruction of human coronary and peripheral arteries from images recorded during two-dimensional intravascular ultrasound examination. Circulation 1991;84:1938–1956.
18.
Coy KM, Park JC, Fishbein MC, Laas T, Diamond GA, Adler L, Maurer G, Siegel RJ: In vitro validation of three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound for the evaluation of arterial injury after balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:692–700.
19.
Gundersen HJG, Boysen M, Reith A: Comparison of semiautomatic digitizer-tablet and simple point counting performance in morphometry. Virchows Arch 1981;37:317–325.
20.
Mathieu O, Cruz-Orive LM, Hoppeler H, Weibel ER: Measuring error and sampling variation in stereology: Comparison of the efficiency of various methods for planar image analysis. J Microsc 1981;121:75–88.
21.
Cruz-Orive LM, Myking AO: Stereological estimation of volume ratios by systematic sections. J Microsc 1981;122:143–157.
22.
Michel RP, Cruz-Orive LM: Application of the Cavalieri principle and vertical sections method to lung: Estimation of volume and pleural surface area. J Microsc 1988;150:117–136.
23.
Gundersen HJG, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, Marcussen N, Moller A, Nielsen K, Nyengaard JR, Pakkenberg B, Sorensen FB, Vesterby A, West MJ: Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 1988;96:379–394.
24.
Cruz-Orive LM: On the precision of systematic sampling: A review of Matheron’s transitive methods. J Microsc 1989;153:315–333.
25.
Pache JC, Roberts N, Vock P, Zimmermann A, Cruz-Orive LM: Vertical LM sectioning and parallel CT scanning designs for stereology: Application to human lung. J Microsc 1993;170 (pt 1):9–24.
26.
Gundersen HJG: Stereology of arbitrary particles. A review of unbiased number and size estimators and the presentation of some new ones, in memory of William R. Thompson. J Microsc 1986;143:3–45.
27.
Cruz-Orive LM: Precision of Cavalieri sections and slices with local errors. J Microsc 1999;193:182–198.
28.
Gundersen HJG, Jensen EBV, Kiêu K, Nielsen J: The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology – reconsidered. J Microsc 1999;193:199–211.
29.
Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307–310.
30.
Bosmans JM, Vrints CJ, Kockx MM, Bult H, Cromheeke KMC, Herman AG: Continuous perivascular L-arginine delivery increases total vessel area and reduces neointimal thickening after experimental balloon dilatation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:767–776.
31.
Kakuta T, Usui M, Coats WDJr, Currier JW, Numano F, Faxon DP: Arterial remodeling at the reference site after angioplasty in the atherosclerotic rabbit model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1998;18:47–51.
32.
Nafe R: Planimetry in pathology – a method in its own right besides stereology and automatic image analysis. Exp Pathol 1991;43:239–246.
33.
Braendgaard H, Gundersen HJG: The impact of recent stereological advances on quantitative studies of the nervous system. J Neurosci Methods 1986;18:39–78.
34.
Pakkenberg B, Boesen J, Albeck M, Gjerris F: Unbiased and efficient estimation of total ventricular volume of the brain obtained from CT-scans by a stereological method. Neuroradiology 1989;31:413–417.
35.
von Birgelen C, Di Mario C, Li W, Schuurbiers JCH, Slager CJ, de Feyter PJ, Roelandt JRTC, Serruys PW: Morphometric analysis in three-dimensional intracoronary ultrasound: An in vitro and in vivo study performed with a novel system for the contour detection of lumen and plaque. Am Heart J 1996;132:516–527.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.