Since research is concentrated to a large extent on patients with left bundle branch block, we aimed at evaluating the hypothesis that measurements of certain intervals and other characteristics of the ECG may change over time in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB), and to design a model, which could be implemented in research and clinical practice, irrespective of the specific ECG features present. The duration of the QRS complex, QT, QTc, and PR intervals, the frontal QRS axis, the heart rate and the presence of hemiblocks, atrioventricular blocks, and atrial fibrillation were compared in the 1st and last of all available ECGs for each patient. Also, a subgroup of patients who had a ventricular aneurysm (VA) was compared with the remaining patients, with respect to the above variables. This longitudinal analysis included all of the patients with RBBB followed in our Cardiology Clinic. There were no significant changes in the ECG variables from the two ECGs recorded 487.6 ± 410.1 (range 0–1,476) days apart, in the two comparisons carried out in 151 patients with RBBB. Comparison of the above-described ECG intervals and characteristics of patients with RBBB were found to be stable over the time course of the investigation. This methodological study is presented as a model to be used serially and prospectively in research and clinical practice for the follow-up of patients with bundle branch block, VA, dilated cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, or those considered for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

1.
Wagner GS: Marriott’s Practical Electrocardiography, ed 9. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1994, pp 79, 83, 96.
2.
Mirvis DM: Electrocardiography. A Physiologic Approach. St. Louis, Mosby, 1993, p 304.
3.
Grant’s Clinical Electrocardiography, ed 2, rev Beckwith JR. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1970, p 121.
4.
Macfarlane PW, Vetch Lawrie TD: Comprehensive Electrocardiography. New York, Pergamon, 1989, p 476.
5.
Lipman BS, Dunn M, Massie E (eds): Clinical Electrocardiography, ed 7. Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers, 1984, p 146.
6.
Goldberger AL, Goldberger E: Clinical Electrocardiography. A Simplified Approach, ed 5. St. Louis, Mosby, 1994, p 73.
7.
Goldberger AL: Myocardial Infarction. Electrocardiographic Differential Diagnosis. St. Louis, Mosby, 1975, p 70.
8.
Sodi-Pallares D: New Bases of Electrocardiography. St. Louis, Mosby, 1956, pp 404, 419.
9.
Bristow MR, Feldman AM, Saxon LA: Heart failure management using implantable devices for ventricular resynchronization: Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial. COMPANION Steering Committee and COMPANION Clinical Investigators. J Card Fail 2000;6:276–285.
10.
Kass DA, Chen C-H, Curry C, et al: Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay. Circulation 1999;99:567–573.
11.
Saxon LA, Kumar UN, De Marco T: Heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapies: US experience in the year 2000. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2000;5:188–194.
12.
Stellbrink C, Auricchio A, Diem B, et al: Potential benefit of biventricular pacing in patients with congestive heart failure and ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:143D–150D.
13.
Auricchio A, Klen H, Sack S, et al: The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure (PATH_CHF) Study: Rationale, design and endpoints of a prospective randomized multicenter study. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:130D–135D.
14.
Auricchio A, Klen H, Tockman B, et al: Transvenous biventricular pacing for heart failure: Can the obstacles be overcome? Am J Cardiol 1999;83:136D–142D.
15.
Shamin W, Francis DP, Yousuffuddin M, et al: Intraventricular conduction delay: A prognostic marker in chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 1999;70:171–178.
16.
Gottipaty VK, Krelis SP, Lu F, et al: The resting electrocardiogram provides a sensitive and inexpensive marker of prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:145A.
17.
Silverman ME, Pressel MD, Brackett JC, et al: Prognostic value of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and a prolonged QRS in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:460–464.
18.
Aranda JM, Schofield RS, Leach D, et al: Ventricular dyssynchrony in dilated cardiomyopathy: The role of biventricular pacing in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Clin Cardiol 2002;25:357–362.
19.
Caseau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, et al: Multisite Stimulation in Cardiomyopathies (MUSTIC) Study Investigators. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 2001;344:873–880.
20.
Krahnfield O, Vogt J, Tenderich G, et al: Increase in oxygen uptake during exercise and changes of QRS duration in patients with biventricular pacing system for congestive heart failure treatment (abstract P470). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999;22(pt II):A199.
21.
Aranda JM, Carlson ER, Pauly DF, et al: QRS duration variability in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:335–337
22.
Schoeller R, Andersen D, Buttner P, et al: First- or second-degree atrioventricular block as a risk factor in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1993;71:720–726.
23.
Xiao HB, Roy C, Fujimoro S, et al: Natural history of abnormal conduction and its relation to prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 1996;53:163–170.
24.
Talbot S: QT interval in right and left bundle-branch block. Br Heart J 1973;35:288–291.
25.
Wilensky RL, Yudelman P, Cohen AI, et al: Serial electrocardiographic changes in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy confirmed at necropsy. Am J Cardiol 1988;62:276–283.
26.
Shamim W, Yousufuddin M, Cicoria M, et al: Incremental changes in QRS duration in serial ECGs over time identify high risk elderly patients with heart failure. Heart 2002;88:47–51.
27.
Hewlett-Packard Interpretive Cardiograph. Physician’s Guide HP part No. M1700-92908, ed 4. Indianapolis, Indiana, Hewlett Packard, 1994, pp 4-3, 4-4, 5-9, 7-4.
28.
Norusis MJ: The SPSS Guide to Data Analysis for SPDD/PC+, ed 2. Chicago, SPSS, Inc., 1991, pp 244, 362, 374, 390.
29.
Hassapoyannes CA, Stuck LM, Hornung CA, et al: Effect of left ventricular aneurysm on risk of sudden and nonsudden cardiac death. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:454–459.
30.
Hochman JS, Brooks MM, Morris M, et al: Prognostic significance of left ventricular aneurysm in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) population. Am Heart J 1994;127:824–832.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.