Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or OpenAthens)

For the academic login, please select your organization on the next page. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

OpenAthens/Shibboleth

×Sorry, you don't have access to this article
Eur Addict Res 2005;11:193–196
(DOI:10.1159/000086401)

Use of Illegally Acquired Medical Opioids by Opiate-Dependent Patients in Detoxification Treatment

Scherbaum N.a · Kluwig J.a · Meiering C.a · Gastpar M.b

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine and bDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Rheinische Kliniken Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

Corresponding Author

Prof. Dr. med. Norbert Scherbaum

Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine

Rheinische Kliniken Essen, University Hospital Essen

Virchowstrasse 174, DE–45147 Essen (Germany)

Tel. +49 201 7227 180, Fax +49 201 7227 303, E-Mail norbert.scherbaum@uni-essen.de

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Abstract

Take-home dosages in maintenance treatment are of great therapeutic importance, but they include the risk of the substitute being distributed illegally. We reviewed the extent of consumption of illegally acquired medical opiates by 142 opiate- or poly-addicted patients consecutively admitted to a detoxification ward. 76 (53.5%) of them admitted to taking illegally acquired medical opiates, usually methadone, at least once. The cumulative duration was 30 days (median). Motivation was usually due to difficulties in acquiring heroin, however one third reported use in an attempt at self-detoxification or as transition before entering maintenance treatment. Maintenance patients were usually the source of the opiates. The results prove the necessity of stringent conditions for take-home dosages, and illustrate deficits in the health care system.

© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Drogenbeauftragte der Bundesregierung: Drogen- und Suchtbericht (Report on Drug and Dependance). Bundesgesundheitsministerium, 2003. www.bmgs.bund.de.
  2. Senay EC: Opioids: Methadone maintenance; in Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds): Textbook of Substance Abuse Treatment. Washington, American Psychiatric Press, 1999, pp 271–279.
  3. German Federal Regulations for Prescription and Use of Controlled Substances (Betäubungsmittelverschreibungsverordnung, BtMVV), BGB1 2001;28:1180–1200. www.bundesgesetzblatt.de/bgbllf/b1findex.htm.
  4. Chutuape MA, Silverman K, Stitzer ML: Survey assessment of methadone treatment services as reinforcers. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1998;24:1–16.
  5. Preston KL, Umbricht A, Epstein DH: Abstinence reinforcement maintenance contingency and one-year follow-up. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002;67:125–137.
  6. Vormfelde SV, Poser W: Death attributed to Methadone. Pharmacopsychiatry 2001;34:217–222.
  7. Scherbaum N, Specka M, Hauptmann G, Gastpar M: Senkt die Methadonsubstitution die Mortalität Opiatabhängiger? Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2002;70:455–461.
  8. Wagner-Servais, D: Kritische Aspekte der derzeitigen Methadon-Behandlung in Deutschland. Dtsch Med Wschr 2001;126:275–278.
  9. Rounsaville BJ, Kleber TR: Untreated opiate addicts: How do they differ from those seeking treatment? Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:1072–1077.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Research Report

Published online: August 19, 2005

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1022-6877 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9891 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/EAR