Background: We studied whether the measurement of intrarenal vascular resistance by Doppler ultrasonography, capable of investigating renal interstitial compartment, allows the early detection of chronic tubulointerstitial nephropathy (TIN). Methods: 30 normotensive and 28 hypertensive (I-II OMS) patients with a clinical history suggestive of chronic TIN and normal renal function were enrolled. 40 healthy volunteers served as controls. Patients were considered TIN-negative or TIN-positive after investigating tubular function by urine concentrating and acidification tests. Renal sonographic parameters and renal resistive index (RRI) were obtained by duplex scanner. Glomerular filtration rate/effective renal plasmatic flow ratio was investigated by sequential renal scintigraphy in TIN-negative and TIN-positive patients; 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy was also performed in TIN-positive patients. Results: RRI values of TIN-positive normotensive and hypertensive patients were significantly higher (p < 0.01 for both) than those of TIN-negative patients and of controls. RRI values resulted to be linearly related to uricemia (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001) only in normotensive patients. RRI values also resulted to be linearly related to filtration ratio values (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001). 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy confirmed interstitial renal damage (grade 1 and 2). Conclusion: RRI measurement allows the early identification of both normotensive and hypertensive patients with chronic TIN and signs of tubular dysfunction, when renal function is still preserved.

Keywords:
Renal resistive index, Doppler ultrasound, Tubulointerstitial nephropathy, Essential hypertension
1.
Rastegar A, Kashgarian M: The clinical spectrum of tubulo-interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int 1998;54:313–327.
2.
Kang DH, Nakagawa T: Uric acid and chronic renal disease: possible implication of hyperuricemia on progression of renal disease. Semin Nephrol 2005;25:43–49.
3.
Halpern EJ, Merton DA, Forsberg F: Effect of distal resistance on Doppler US flow patterns. Radiology 1998;206:761–766.
4.
Radermacher J, Ellis S, Haller H: Renal resistance index and progression of renal disease. Hypertension 2002;39:699–703.
5.
Tublin ME, Bude RO, Platt JF: The resistive index in renal Doppler sonography: where do we stand? Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:885–892.
6.
Aasarod K, Haga HJ, Berg KJ, Hammerstrom J, Jorstad S: Renal involvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Q J Med 2000;93:297–304.
7.
La Cava G, Sciagrà R, Formiconi AR, Meldolesi U: Validation of a new method for quantifying renal function. Contrib Nephrol. Basel, Karger, 1990, vol 79, pp 82–86.
8.
Cockcroft DW, Gault MH: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16:31–41.
9.
Bengtsson C, Bengtsson U: Urine concentrating capacity in women: the results of a screening method in a population study. Clin Nephrol 1976;6:518–522.
10.
Moghazi S, Jones E, Schroepple J, Arya K, McClellan W, Hennigar RA, O’Neill WC: Correlation of renal histopathology with sonographic findings. Kidney Int 2005;67:1515–1520.
11.
Boddi M, Sacchi S, Lammel RM, Mohseni R, Serneri GG: Age-related and vasomotor stimuli-induced changes in renal vascular resistance detected by Doppler ultrasound. Am J Hypertens 1996;9:461–466.
12.
Imperiale I, Olianti C, Sestini S, Materassi M, Seracini D, Ienuso R, La Cava G: 123I-hippuran renal scintigraphy with evaluation of single-kidney clearance for predicting renal scarring after acute urinary tract infection: comparison with 99mTc-DMSA scanning. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1755–1760.
13.
Pontremoli R, Viazzi F, Martinoli C, Ravera M, Nicolella C, Berruti V, Leoncini G, Ruello N, Zagami P, Bezante GP, Derchi LE, Deferrari G: Increased renal resistive index in patients with essential hypertension: a marker of target organ damage. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:360–365.
14.
Johnson RJ, Herrera-Acosta J, Schreiner GF, Rodriguez-Iturbe B: Subtle acquired renal injury as a mechanism of salt-sensitive hypertension. N Engl J Med 2002;346:913–923.
15.
Iseki K, Oshiro S, Tozawa M, Iseki C, Ikemiya Y, Takishita S: Significance of hyperuricemia on the early detection of renal failure in a cohort of screened subjects. Hypertens Res 2001;24:691–697.
16.
Sanchez-Lozada LG, Tapia E, Santamaria J, Avila-Casado C, Soto V, Nepomuceno T, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Johnson RJ, Herrera-Acosta J: Mild hyperuricemia induces vasoconstriction and maintains glomerular hypertension in normal and remnant kidney rats. Kidney Int 2005;67:237–247.
17.
Myllymaki J, Honkanen T, Syrjanen J, Helin H, Rantala I, Pasternack A, Mustonen J: Uric acid correlates with the severity of histopathological parameters in IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:89–95.
18.
Bude RO, Rubin JM: Relationship between the resistive index and vascular compliance and resistance. Radiology 1999;211:411–417.
19.
Eknoyan G, McDonald MA, Appel D, Truong LD: Chronic tubulo-interstitial nephritis: correlation between structural and functional findings. Kidney Int 1990;38:736–743.
20.
Platt JF, Ellis JH, Rubin JM, DiPietro MA, Sedman AB: Intrarenal arterial Doppler sonography in patients with nonobstructive renal disease: correlation of resistive index with biopsy findings. Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:1223–1227.
21.
Turkmen M, Kavukcu S, Sarioglu S, Goktay Y, Soylu A, Ozer E: Renal histomorphometry and resistance index in children with renal disease. J Clin Ultrasound 2000;28:73–77.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.