The effect of shear stress at the endothelium in the attenuation of the noradrenaline-induced constriction of the femoral vascular bed perfused at a constant blood flow was investigated in 16 anesthetized cats. It is known that the adrenergic vasoconstriction of the femoral vascular bed is considerably greater at a constant pressure perfusion than at a constant blood flow. This difference may depend on the ability of the endothelium to relax smooth muscle in response to an increase in wall shear stress. Since the shear stress is directly related to the blood flow and inversely related to the third power of vessel diameter, vasoconstriction at a constant blood flow increases the wall shear stress that is the stimulus for smooth muscle relaxation opposing constriction. On the other hand, at a constant perfusion pressure, vasoconstriction is accompanied by a decrease in flow rate, which prevents a wall shear stress increase. To reveal the effect of endothelial sensitivity to shear stress, we compared noradrenaline-induced changes in total and proximal arterial resistances during perfusion of the hind limb at a constant blood flow and at a constant pressure in vessels with intact and injured endothelium. We found that in the endothelium-intact bed the same concentration of noradrenaline at a constant flow caused an increase in overall vascular peripheral resistance that was half as large as at a constant perfusion pressure. This difference is mainly confined to the proximal arterial vessels (arteries and large arterioles) whose resistance at a constant flow increased only 0.19 ± 0.03 times compared to that at a constant pressure. The removal of the endothelium only slightly increased constrictor responses at the perfusion under a constant pressure (noradrenaline-induced increases of both overall and proximal arterial resistance augmented by 12%), while the responses of the proximal vessels at a constant flow became 4.7 ± 0.4 times greater than in the endothelium-intact bed. A selective blockage of endothelium sensitivity to shear stress using a glutaraldehyde dimer augmented the constrictor responses of the proximal vessels at a constant flow 4.6-fold (±0.3), but had no significant effect on the responses at a constant pressure. These results are consistent with the conclusion that the difference in constrictor responses at constant flow and pressure perfusions depends mainly on the smooth muscle relaxation caused by increased wall shear stress.

Keywords:
Endothelium, Shear stress, Vasoconstriction, Endothelium-dependent dilation, Deformability
1.
Burton AC, Stinson RH: The measurement of tension in vascular smooth muscle. J Physiol 1960;153:290–305.
2.
Davis DL, Hammond MC: Effects of constant-inflow and constant-pressure perfusion on vascular responses. Am J Physiol 1969;216:1292–1299.
3.
Kendrick JE, Matson GL: Effect of carotid occlusion on the renal and iliac vascular resistance during constant flow and constant pressure perfusion. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1973;142:1306–1309.
4.
Nikitin LV, Khayutin VM: Theory of measurement of vascular resistance under the influence of control signals. Fed Proc 1962;22,(N2, pt II):T207–T211.
5.
Tesfamariam B, Cohen RA: Inhibition of adrenergic vasoconstriction by endothelial cell shear stress. Circ Res 1988;63:720–725.
6.
Hecker M, Mulsch A, Bassenge E, Busse R: Vasoconstriction and increased flow: two principal mechanisms of shear stress-dependent endothelial autacoid release. Am J Physiol 1993;265:H828–H833.
7.
Melkumyants AM, Balashov SA, Kartamyshev SP: Anticonstrictor effect of endothelium sensitivity to shear stress. Pflügers Arch 1994;427:264–269.
8.
Grishanov YN, Evstifeev IK, Melkumyants AM, Khayutin VM: Automatic pressure stabilization in large arteries during changes in blood flow. Bull Exp Biol Med 1982;94:1157–1159.
9.
Melkumyants AM, Balashov SA, Veselova ES, Khayutin VM: Continuous control of the lumen of feline conduit arteries by blood flow rate. Cardiovasc Res 1987;21:863–870.
10.
Haddy FJ, Richards AG, Alden JL, Visscher MB: Small vein and artery pressures in normal and edematous extremities of dogs under local and general anaesthesia. Am J Physiol 1954;176:335–360.
11.
Bjornberg J, Grande PO, Maspers M, Mellander S: Site of autoregulatory reactions in the vascular bed of cat skeletal muscle as determined with a new technique for segmental vascular resistance recordings. Acta Physiol Scand 1988;133:199–210.
12.
Robertson AL, Rancliffe MB, Ziats NP: Selective endothelial injury and repair (abstract). Fed Proc 1979;38:1456
13.
Melkumyants AM, Balashov SA: The effect of endothelial cells deformability on the control of arterial lumen by the wall shear stress (in Russian). Russ J Physiol 1999;85:910–917.
14.
Melkumyants AM, Balashov SA, Smiesko V, Khayutin VM: Selective blocking of arterial sensitivity to blood flow rate by glutaraldehyde. Bull Exp Biol Med 1986;101:568–570.
15.
Cocks TM, Angus JA: Endothelium-dependent relaxation of coronary arteries by noradrenaline and serotonin. Nature 1983;305:627–630.
16.
Griffith TM, Henderson AH, Edwards DH, Lewis MJ: Isolated perfused rabbit coronary artery and aortic strip preparations: the role of endothelium-derived relaxant factor. J Physiol 1984;351:13–24.
17.
Hynes MR, Dang H, Duckles SP: Contractile responses to adrenergic nerve stimulation are enhanced with removal of endothelium in rat caudal artery. Life Sci 1987;42:357–365.
18.
Lamping KG, Marcus ML, Dole WP: Removal of the endothelium potentiates canine large coronary artery constrictor responses to 5-hydroxytryptamine in vivo. Circ Res 1985;57:46–54.
19.
Martin W, Furchgott RF, VIillani GM, Jothianandan D: Depression of contractile responses in rat aorta by spontaneously released endothelium-derived relaxing factor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1986;237:529–538.
20.
Young MA, Vatner SF: Enhanced adrenergic constriction of iliac artery with removal of endothelium in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol 1986;250:H892–H897.
21.
Khayutin VM: Active arterial function: prompt adaptation of the vascular lumen to the blood flow velocity and viscosity; in Chernyi GG, Regirer SA (eds): Contemporary Problems of Biomechanics. Moscow and Boca Raton, Mir Publishers and CRC Press, 1990, pp 142–207.
22.
Pohl U, Herlan K, Huang A, Bassenge E: EDRF-mediated shear-induced dilation opposes myogenic vasoconstriction in small rabbit arteries. Am J Physiol 1991;261:H2016–H2023.
23.
Lamontagne D, Pohl U, Busse R: Mechanical deformation of vessel wall and shear stress determine the basal release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor in the intact rabbit coronary vascular bed. Circ Res 1992;70:123–130.
24.
Kuo L, Chilian WM, Davis MJ: Interaction of pressure- and flow-induced responses in porcine coronary resistance vessels. Am J Physiol 1991;261:H1706–H1715.
25.
Sun D, Kaley G, Koller A: Characteristics and origin of myogenic response in isolated gracilis muscle arterioles. Am J Physiol 1994;266:H1177–H1183.
26.
Davis MJ: Myogenic response gradient in an arteriolar network. Am J Physiol 1993;264:H2168–H2179.
27.
Melkumyants AM, Balashov SA, Khayutin VM: Control of arterial lumen by shear stress on endothelium. News Physiol Sci 1995;10:204–210.
28.
Lew MJ, Rivers RJ, Duling BR: Arteriolar smooth muscle responses are modulated by an intramural diffusion barrier. Am J Physiol 1989;257:H10–H16.
29.
Lew MJ, Duling BR: Arteriolar reactivity in vivo is influenced by an intramural diffusion barrier. Am J Physiol 1990;259:H1574–H1581.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.