Aim: To evaluate if early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) improves breast-feeding (BF) behavior and exclusive BF (EBF) rates in term infants at 48 h of age. Methods: Term infants born by normal delivery were randomized at birth to either early SSC (n = 20) or conventional care (controls; n = 21). SSC was continued for at least 2 h after birth. Subsequently, one BF session of the infants was video recorded at about 48 h of life. The primary outcome, infants’ BF behavior at 48 h of life, was assessed using the modified infant Breast-Feeding Assessment Tool (BAT; a score consisting of infant’s readiness to feed, sucking, rooting and latching, each item scored from 0 to 3) by three independent masked observers. The secondary outcomes were EBF rates at 48 h and 6 weeks of age and salivary cortisol level of infants at 6 h of age. Results: Baseline characteristics including birth weight and gestation were comparable between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the BAT scores between the groups [median: 8, interquartile range (IQR) 5–10 vs. median 9, IQR 5–10; p = 0.6]. EBF rates at 48 h and at 6 weeks were, however, significantly higher in the early-SSC group than in the control group [95.0 vs. 38.1%; relative risk (RR): 2.5, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.4–4.3 and 90 vs. 28.6%; RR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.6–6.3]. Interpretation: Early SSC did not improve BF behavior at discharge but significantly improved the EBF rates of term neonates.

Keywords:
Breast feeding, Skin-to-skin contact, Neonatal stress
1.
Moore ER, Anderson GC, Bergman N: Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;3:CD003519.
2.
Bornstein MH: Sensitive periods in development: structural characteristics and causal interpretations. Psychol Bull 1989;105:179–197.
3.
Anderson GC: The mother and her newborn: mutual caregivers. JOGN Nurs 1977;6:50–57.
4.
Sobel HL, Silvestre MA, Mantaring JB 3rd, Oliveros YE, Nyunt-US: Immediate newborn care practices delay thermoregulation and breastfeeding initiation. Acta Paediatr 2011;100:1127–1133.
5.
Harrod-Wild K: Lessons from the latest infant feeding survey. J Fam Health Care 2007;17:153–154.
6.
Carfoot S, Williamson PR, Dickson R: The value of a pilot study in breast-feeding research. Midwifery 2004;20:188–193.
7.
Mizuno K, Mizuno N, Shinohara T, Noda M: Mother-infant skin-to-skin contact after delivery results in early recognition of own mother’s milk odour. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:1640–1645.
8.
Carfoot S, Williamson P, Dickson R: A randomized controlled trial in the north of England examining the effects of skin-to-skin care on breast feeding. Midwifery 2005;21:71–79.
9.
Moore ER, Anderson GC: Randomized controlled trial of very early mother-infant skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding status. J Midwifery Women’s Health 2007;52:116–125.
10.
Evalotte M, Theodorsson E, Nelson N: Salivary cortisol and mood and pain profiles during skin-to-skin care for an unselected group of mothers and infants in neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 2005;116:1105–1113.
11.
Anderson GC, Chang HP, Behnke M, Conlon M, Eyler FD: Self-regulatory mothering (SR) post birth. Effect on, and correlation between, infant crying and salivary cortisol. Pediatr Res 1995;37:12A.
12.
World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing breast feeding practices. WHO/CDD/SER/91.4.
13.
Takahashi Y, Tamakoshi K, Matsushima M, Kawabe T: Comparison of salivary cortisol, heart rate, and oxygen saturation between early skin-to-skin contact with different initiation and duration times in healthy, full-term infants. Early Hum Dev 2011;87:151–157.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.