Original Paper
Edaravone (Radical Scavenger) versus Sodium Ozagrel (Antiplatelet Agent) in Acute Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke (EDO Trial)Shinohara Y.a · Saito I.b · Kobayashi S.c · Uchiyama S.daFederation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations Tachikawa Hospital, bFuji Brain Institute and Hospital, cShimane University Faculty of Medicine, and dTokyo Women’s Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Do you have an account?
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more
Subscribe
- Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
- Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
- Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
Article / Publication Details
Received: June 24, 2008
Accepted: February 09, 2009
Published online: March 26, 2009
Issue release date: April 2009
Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 4
ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/CED
Abstract
Background: Edaravone, a free radical scavenger approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in 2001 for treating acute ischemic stroke, was recommended by the Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Stroke 2004. While edaravone also has a neuroprotective profile, there is no other recognized drug that can verify its effect in clinical trials despite the need for neuroprotection. We performed a postmarketing clinical trial to provide further reliable evidence concerning edaravone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We conducted a multicenter randomized parallel-group open-label trial of edaravone intravenously and a control drug, sodium ozagrel (ozagrel), a thromboxane A2 synthase inhibitor, intravenously in acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. The primary endpoint was the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months after treatment initiation. Results: In total, 401 patients were initially enrolled. The rate of ‘grade 0–1’ on the modified Rankin Scale, as assessed at 3 months, was 57.1 and 50.3% in the edaravone and ozagrel groups, respectively. The intergroup difference was 6.8% (95% confidence interval = –3.1 to 16.7), indicating noninferiority of edaravone to ozagrel, since the lower limit of the confidence interval did not exceed –11.4%. There were no particular concerns over the safety of edaravone. Conclusion: This trial verified that edaravone was not inferior to ozagrel. Edaravone was at least as effective as ozagrel for the treatment of acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Received: June 24, 2008
Accepted: February 09, 2009
Published online: March 26, 2009
Issue release date: April 2009
Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 4
ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/CED
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission