Maternal Smoking, Obesity and Male Fetal Sex Predispose to a Large Nuchal Translucency Thickness in Healthy FetusesRode L.a · Ekelund C.a · Pedersen N.G.a · Wøjdemann K.R.a · Christiansen M.b · Sundberg K.a · Tabor A.a
aDepartment of Fetal Medicine and Ultrasound, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, and bDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Fetal Medicine and Ultrasound
4002 Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9
DK–2100 Copenhagen (Denmark)
Tel. +45 3545 3722, Fax +45 3545 4749, E-Mail email@example.com
Do you have an account?
Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate the effect of fetal sex, smoking and body mass index (BMI) on nuchal translucency (NT). Methods: We analyzed data from 7,357 women with a normal singleton live birth outcome with information on smoking, BMI and sex of the infant. NT measurements were converted to multiples of the median (MoMNT) using a previously reported linear regression analysis. Results: The odds ratio (OR) for MoMNT >95th centile was 1.5 (95% CI 1.2–1.9) for smokers compared to nonsmokers and 1.4 (95% CI 1.1–1.7) for male fetuses compared to female fetuses. Obese women (BMI ≧30) had an increased OR for a large NT of 1.7 (95% CI 1.2–2.6) compared to normal weight women. Obese smokers carrying a male fetus had an OR of 4.2 (95% CI 1.7–10.1) of a MoMNT >95th centile compared to normal weight nonsmoking women with a female fetus. The effects of smoking, obesity status and fetal sex were independent of each other. Conclusions: Smoking, obesity and male sex are associated to a MoMNT >95th centile. This may affect screening performance and entail unnecessary anxiety in these women. Further investigations, including fetuses with adverse outcome, are needed.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.