Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the histological results of a prostate needle biopsy scheme of 12 and 18 cores used in 372 consecutive patients submitted to an early stage diagnosis programme for prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods: From February 2002 to July 2003 a transperineal TRUS-guided prostate needle biopsy was performed in 372 patients aged 40–73. Indications for biopsy were: suspected DRE, total PSA (PSAt) >10 ng/ml; PSAt equal to 4–10, 2.6–3.9, ≤2.5 ng/ml and PSA F/T <25%, <20% and <15%, respectively. In 256 patients, we performed 12 cores and in 116 cases 18 cores. Results: 159 (42.7%) patients were diagnosed with PCa, 138 (37%) with BPH, 58 (15.7%) with chronic prostatitis, 15 (4%) with a HGPIN, 2 (0.6%) with ASAP. In patients that underwent 12 and 18 cores the incidence of PCa was 39.8 and 49%; the incidence of PCa in patients with PSA ≤10 and >10 ng/ml submitted to 12 and 18 cores was 35 vs. 47% and 57.8 vs. 52%, respectively. The preponderance of clinical stage T1c was 50% (12 cores) vs. 72% (18 cores). The median bioptic Gleason score in both groups resulted 6.6 (12 cores) and 6 (18 cores). In 110 (12 bioptic cores) and in 30 (18 bioptic cores) patients that underwent a RRP, the pTNM proved a significant clinical neoplasm (Gleason score ≧6 and/or tumoral volume >0.5 cm3) in the first group in all cases, while in the second group in 28/30 (94%) cases. Conclusions: Extended schemes of prostate needle biopsy of 18 or more cores increases the PCa diagnosis in early stage and should be adopted for young patients with a PSA <10 ng/ml, negative DRE and in case of rebiopsies.

Keywords:
Prostate cancer, Extended prostate needle biopsy, Ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.