Objective: Systematic sextant biopsies are a powerful tool in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Interpretation of the histopathologic results of these biopsies plays a central role in treatment decisions. This biopsy approach was originally described as sampling the prostate in the mid-lobe, parasagittal plane at the apex, mid-gland, and base, bilaterally. Morphometric analysis of prostate specimens has revealed that most clinically significant cancers are mainly located in the posterolateral aspect of the gland, not the mid-lobe. We sought to determine if cancer detection could be improved by obtaining more laterally placed biopsies. Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients underwent transrectal ultrasound with mid-lobe sextant as well as lateral sextant biopsies. Biopsy specimens were evaluated for Gleason grade and length of cancer present in each core. The mid-lobe and lateral biopsy results were then compared. Results: Thirteen of 41 patients (31.7%) were found to have no cancer on either biopsy set. Cancer was detected by both the mid-lobe and the lateral biopsies in 19 patients (46.3%). In 6 patients (14.6%), only the lateral biopsies revealed cancer, and in 3 patients (7.3%), only the mid-lobe biopsies revealed cancer. Conclusions: Laterally-placed systematic sextant biopsies may yield an improved diagnosis rate in patients with palpable nodularity in the lateral aspect of the prostate, patients without any palpable abnormalities but with elevated PSA levels, and in those patients undergoing repeat biopsies.

Keywords:
Prostatic neoplasms, Biopsy, Ultrasonography
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel
1997
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.